AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Kin-Sheng Chang

CALC150A · MATH251F · MATH141 · MATH150A · MATHMATH · MATH250A · MATH150B · MATH152 · MATH20 · MATH120 · MATH130 · MATH151 · MATH10 · CALC150B · MATH251 · MATH100 · 38 lifetime ratings

AI rating
78/100
RMP rating
3.6/5
Take again
72%
Difficulty
2.5

The decision

if you want a forgiving math grade and can learn much of the material on your own.

Best fit · Effort For RewardGenerous Extra CreditSelf-Study RequiredKind ProfessorHomework HeavyExam Questions From Classwork
  • Grades are often very forgiving because of , replacement policies, and .
  • Many students like him personally but say lectures can be boring, hard to hear, or hard to understand.
  • and want a fair path to pass math.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

88/100

High grades , and exams that often mirror practice problems.

In-person reviews strongly support the easy-grade pattern, while the single online review is positive but .

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

The math content itself can be difficult, especially calculus, but the subject.

In-person reviews separate hard , while online evidence is too limited to compare.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

45/100

classwork, so it is not always strictly mandatory but is important for the grade.

In-person reviews repeatedly mention attendance and , while the .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

76/100

Students recommend him for passing with a good grade, but not always for .

The online review is very positive, while concerns.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

92/100

, and classwork-based exams make grades unusually forgiving.

Format shift

The generous grading pattern is overwhelmingly supported by in-person reviews, with .

Workload

Moderate

45/100

The grade is forgiving, but students repeatedly mention lots of , and math lab effort.

Format shift

and classwork demands, while the online review does not describe workload clearly.

Teaching experience

Average

58/100

He is caring and patient, but many students .

Format shift

The one online review praises his teaching, while and weak lecture delivery.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

, and , with exams often taken from classwork or homework.

Format shift

, while online exam evidence is not clearly stated.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

37 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews show a very forgiving grade structure but frequent , and self-teaching.

Main concern

Students may earn high grades without feeling they learned the material deeply.

What students said

“If you just want to pass this class you can do so with a .”
MATH151
“you WILL have to do most of the learning outside of class.”
MATH151
“The ”
CALC150B

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

The single online review is very positive and praises his care and teaching.

Main concern

There is only one online review, so online evidence is limited.

What students said

“He really cares about students and wants us to understand the materials.”
MATH150B

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are usually student-friendly because questions often come from classwork, homework, or study guides, with .

Exams From ClassworkExtra CreditStudy GuidesTake-Home Test Mentioned

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

83/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews say exams commonly come directly from classwork, homework, practice tests, or study guides, with softening scores.

Exams From ClassworkHomework-Based QuestionsStudy Guide FinalExtra Credit
“ to you.”
MATH151
“The .”
MATH152
“For the exactly like the exam.”
MATH20

Online

The single online review does not clearly prove exam .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you just want to pass this class you can do so with a .”

Voice snapshots generated from 38 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and exams. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

58/100

“sweet guy, meh teacher.”

⚖️

92/100

“60% test average, still passed with A”

👍 Recommendation Rate

76/100

“I would 100% recommend you take him!”

Theme 1

📈 About Grades &

  • the amount of he gives is insane.
  • Passed this class with a 116%
  • This saint of a man gives you 15% .

Theme 2

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He clearly loves math. However, he is not an effective communicator.
  • Lectures are long and boring with no break.
  • He really cares about students and wants us to understand the materials.

Theme 3

🧮 About Exams

  • .
  • All of or classwork problems.
  • tests are the same as the .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

38

Recent reviews read by the AI

38

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Thirty-eight reviews across many years are detailed and , and lecture weaknesses.

Inside 38 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 516
4 out of 58
3 out of 54
2 out of 57
1 out of 53

Course coverage

MATH1517 reviews
MATH150B6 reviews
MATH1304 reviews
CALC150B3 reviews
MATH1203 reviews
Show 11 more courses
MATH2513 reviews
MATH1002 reviews
MATH1522 reviews
CALC150A1 review
MATH101 review
MATH1411 review
MATH150A1 review
MATH201 review
MATH250A1 review
MATH251F1 review
MATHMATH1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

20 reported outcomes

A range

17

A+ 9 · A 8

B range

2

B+ 1 · B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Rather not say 1