AI Rate Professor

English As A Second Language

Gaitatjis Elizabeth

ESL · ESL184 · ENG110 · ESL185 · ENGL110 · ESH1059 · ESL186 · 20 lifetime ratings

AI rating
77/100
RMP rating
4.2/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
2.7

The decision

if you want strong support and can keep up with a writing-heavy workload.

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaring and supportiveClear step-by-step guidanceHeavy writing workloadFlexible deadlinesMixed online experience
  • , and support for ESL writing growth.
  • The course often , and projects, so the A is earned through steady work.
  • Online reviews are much weaker, citing long lectures, disorganization, and poor fit for online teaching.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

68/100

Students can earn high grades with deadline flexibility and support, but many say the grade requires consistent writing work.

In-person reviews suggest fair effort for reward, while online reviews are less reliable and .

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

The class is manageable with guidance, but writing volume and ESL skill development make it more than a simple easy course.

In-person reviews describe structured but work-heavy learning, while online reviews report more confusion and disorganization.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

58/100

Reviews suggest being in class and participating matters, but they do not clearly prove a .

Online evidence includes a skip-class warning, while in-person evidence mostly emphasizes attending lectures to succeed.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

78/100

Most students recommend her because , and helps students improve, though online reviews reduce confidence.

, while online reviews are mixed to negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

72/100

Students mention deadline extensions, grace time, , and good grades when work is completed.

Format shift

, while online reviews give weaker support.

Workload

Heavy

32/100

Many reviews describe lots of essays, journals, reading logs, exercises, and projects.

Format shift

In-person reviews especially emphasize heavy writing work, while but poor organization.

Teaching experience

Good

82/100

Most reviews , and writing support.

Format shift

Teaching is rated much stronger in person than online.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

Reviews , and assignments rather than exams.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

18 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

guidance, and strong preparation despite heavy work.

Main concern

The workload , and group projects.

What students said

“There are and 3 group projects”
ESL185
“She guides you step by step.”
ESL186
“If you keep working hard, you'll get a good grade.”
ESL186

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are mixed to negative, with and another calling the class disorganized.

Main concern

Online organization and pacing may be frustrating.

What students said

“Took her class online, long lectures but .”
ENGL110
“online classes are not her thing”
ESL185

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention final projects but do not .

Final projects mentionedExam policy unclear

Assessment risk

Varies

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

format, proctoring, or open-book policy.

Exam policy unclear

Online

but do not clearly prove proctoring, webcam use, Lockdown Browser, or open-book exams.

Final projects mentionedExam policy unclear
“It does not give you enough time to prepare the .”
ESL185

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you keep working hard, you'll get a good grade.”

Voice snapshots generated from 20 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

82/100

“She guides you step by step.”

📚 Workload Reality

32/100

“The amount of work in this class is DRAMATIC”

👍 Recommendation Level

78/100

“ ”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She gives a and thinking
  • , and fun.
  • databases.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • I think everyone can get a A if they go to the lectures and finish the assignments.
  • She wasn't easy, she gave a lot of work, but she gave a week grace time to submit some work.
  • if you're looking for an easy class.

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • she helps me through writing and reading and always supporting me.
  • Very understanding and easy to talk to.
  • She does care students to do better.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

20

Recent reviews read by the AI

20

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Twenty reviews over many years provide detailed and mostly consistent evidence, with .

Inside 20 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 512
4 out of 54
3 out of 52
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ESL18611 reviews
ESL1854 reviews
ENG1101 review
ENGL1101 review
ESH10591 review
Show 2 more courses
ESL1 review
ESL1841 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

9 reported outcomes

A range

5

A+ 3 · A 1 · A- 1

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 1 · Not_Sure_Yet 1