AI Rate Professor

Chemistry

Myeong-Ho Jeong

CHEM107 · CHEM101 · CHEM100 · 14 lifetime ratings

AI rating
7/100
RMP rating
1.4/5
Take again
6.67%
Difficulty
4.3

The decision

Avoid unless you are prepared to self-teach chemistry with little useful lecture support.

Best fit · Self Taught ProSelf-teaching requiredHard to understandReads from slidesTough graderHeavy homework
  • Reviews and students must teach themselves.
  • Students frequently , and unresolved questions.
  • and caring, but it is heavily outweighed by repeated severe warnings.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

18/100

Some students received A or B grades, but the path depends , and low instructional support.

Both online and reviews giving much stronger proof.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

22/100

Intro chemistry becomes difficult because , and students must learn independently.

The lone online review and many .

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

35/100

Participation matters appears in tags, but reviews do not clearly prove a .

In-person evidence mentions participation more than online evidence.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

8/100

Students overwhelmingly warn against taking him because and cannot understand the lectures.

Both formats are negative, with and most repeated warnings.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

26/100

Tough-grader tags are frequent, though one and due-date negotiation.

Format shift

Strict grading complaints appear in both formats, while the .

Workload

Heavy

24/100

Reviews mention lots of , and double studying due to weak instruction.

Format shift

Both formats include heavy-work signals, with much more evidence in person.

Teaching experience

Awful

10/100

Most students , and leaves questions unresolved.

Format shift

Both online and in-person reviews criticize the teaching, with in-person evidence highly consistent.

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

, and tests, so assessment appears mixed rather than purely exam-based.

Format shift

In-person reviews provide most assessment evidence, while the and lecture heaviness.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

14 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are overwhelmingly negative, citing , and poor question support.

Main concern

Students repeatedly say they must learn the course independently.

What students said

“You will have to teach yourself this class.”
CHEM100
“ !”
CHEM100
“Lecture is him simply reading off a powerpoint .”
CHEM100

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The single online review is strongly negative and .

Main concern

Online teaching appears lecture-heavy and unsupported.

What students said

“Heavy accent doesn't really teach just reads off the ”
chem107

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention tests but do not .

Tests mentionedExam policy unclear

Assessment risk

Varies

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and low averages but do not clearly prove whether exams are closed-book, open-book, or proctored.

Tests mentionedExam policy unclear
“ ”
CHEM101

Online

The online review does not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, webcam use, Lockdown Browser, or open-book policy.

Exam policy unclear

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“You will have to teach yourself this class.”

Voice snapshots generated from 15 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

10/100

“Lecture is him simply reading off a powerpoint .”

⚠️ Recommendation Risk

8/100

“ !”

📚 Workload Pressure

24/100

“you will need to study double because most of the time you have to reteach yourself.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He'll mostly read off of the slides
  • hard to understand, mumbles lectures, .
  • Does not teach at all, just reads from the slides but .

Theme 2

📉 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Lots of homework

Theme 3

❓ About Helpfulness

  • questions often went unresolved.
  • Does not answer questions and instead pivots to answering another question.
  • When you ask him a question most of the time he won't understand

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

15

Recent reviews read by the AI

14

Lifetime ratings

90/100

Evidence confidence

Fifteen recent reviews are detailed, consistent, and overwhelmingly negative across formats.

Inside 15 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 512

Course coverage

CHEM10012 reviews
chem1072 reviews
CHEM1011 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

15 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

2

B 2

C range

1

C- 1

D range

1

D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

9

Drop/Withdrawal 2 · Incomplete 2 · Not sure yet 4 · Rather not say 1