AI Rate Professor

Chemistry

Joseph Cipriano

CHEM107 · 13 lifetime ratings

AI rating
79/100
RMP rating
3.9/5
Take again
78.57%
Difficulty
3.1

The decision

if you will keep up with , and want support in a demanding chemistry class.

Best fit · Effort For RewardSupportive in office hoursExtra credit availableHomework heavyTest heavyClear explanations
  • Most students say Cipriano makes chemistry easier to understand and .
  • The , and test preparation despite .
  • A few students report unfairness, rude treatment, or weak online teaching.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

68/100

and support make an A realistic, but students repeatedly say chemistry requires steady studying and homework.

The Easy A evidence is mainly in person, while the single online review reports lots of homework and a C.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

62/100

Students say , but the subject remains study-heavy and test-heavy.

In-person students often find the material understandable, while the online review says the math-heavy class was hard without deeper teaching.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

58/100

Attendance and participation appear useful for practice and questions, but reviews do not clearly prove a .

In-person comments emphasize class practice, office hours, tutoring, and participation, while the .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

78/100

, and helpful, though a few strongly disliked his fairness or online teaching.

In-person recommendation is strong overall, while the single online review says the .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

60/100

helps, but comments about tough grading and .

Format shift

In-person reviews mention extra credit often but , while the online .

Workload

Heavy

35/100

Many students describe lots of , and regular studying.

Format shift

Both formats mention lots of many comments.

Teaching experience

Good

82/100

Most in-person students describe him as , and helpful, but a few report unfair treatment or .

Format shift

, while the only online review says he reads from slides and does not teach well.

Assessment method

Balanced

62/100

The class uses homework, labs, quizzes, , and tests, with several students calling it test-heavy.

Format shift

In-person reviews mention tests, labs, homework, quizzes, and , while online .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

13 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are mostly positive, praising support and clarity while , and .

Main concern

Students must study consistently because homework and .

What students said

“Lots of homework and make sure you stay on top of your studying!”
101
“Make chemistry super easy to understand!”
101
“The .”
101

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The only online review says the class had lots of homework and .

Main concern

The online student .

What students said

“he reads off his slides, doesn't give that extra level of knowledge to help us understand things.”
CHEM107

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams appear standard to moderately demanding, with study guides and practice support but .

Test HeavyStudy GuidesReasonable TestsHard Timed ExamsRandom Short Quizzes

Assessment risk

Standard

54/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews mention test-heavy grading, study guides, random short quizzes, and hard timed exams, but .

Test HeavyStudy GuidesHard Timed ExamsRandom Short Quizzes
“The class is test heavy but has opportunities.”
101
“ but not difficult at all and short.”
CHEM107
“The .”
101

Online

The online review does not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Make chemistry super easy to understand!”

Voice snapshots generated from 14 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

82/100

“Does a great job of working with you during class and at office hours.”

📚 Workload Reality

35/100

“The homework is a lot and the .”

👍 Recommendation Level

78/100

“ . .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Professor was good and made sure that the class understood what was going on.
  • and concise with lectures and labs.
  • Make chemistry super easy to understand!

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Chemistry is a heavy course so you will have to study a lot to get a good grade.
  • he also gives out !
  • The .

Theme 3

⚠️ About Concerns

  • He pick and in his bad side or he will never help you or be very rude to you
  • he reads off his slides, doesn't give that extra level of knowledge to help us understand things.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

14

Recent reviews read by the AI

13

Lifetime ratings

84/100

Evidence confidence

Fourteen reviews from 2022 to 2026 give detailed and mostly consistent evidence, though only one online review limits online confidence.

Inside 14 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 57
4 out of 54
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 52

Course coverage

1019 reviews
CHEM1075 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

13 reported outcomes

A range

7

A+ 2 · A 4 · A- 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

3

C 3

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 1 · Rather not say 1