AI Rate Professor

English

Renee Moulton

ENGL1A · ENG1A · ENGL100F103F · ENGL103 · ENGL101F · ENG103 · 15 lifetime ratings

AI rating
60/100
RMP rating
3.9/5
Take again
66.67%
Difficulty
3.1

The decision

if you like discussion-heavy English classes, can handle a blunt personality, and are willing to work for .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerPolarizing styleStrict essaysHeavy readingFunny energyExtra credit
  • Reviews are split between students who love her humor and energy and students who find the class unprofessional or discouraging.
  • Recent in-person ENG103 , and poor motivation.
  • Students who connect with her , and helpful.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

54/100

Some students got easy A grades with effort and , but and low final grades despite trying.

The lone online review gives no grade-risk detail, while and recently more negative.

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

The course content is standard English, but , and discussion expectations make it feel demanding.

Online evidence is too limited to judge course difficulty, while and essay-heavy work.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

52/100

Participation matters in many reviews, but there is .

and participation, while the online review does not clearly address attendance.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

58/100

Recommendation depends heavily on whether students enjoy her loud, humorous, discussion-based style and .

Online evidence is positive but only one review, while .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

32/100

Recent reviews repeatedly call her a tough or though exists.

Format shift

In-person evidence drives this strict rating, while the .

Workload

Heavy

30/100

Students mention , and participation-based work.

Format shift

In-person reviews provide nearly all workload evidence, while the online .

Teaching experience

Average

68/100

She can be engaging, funny, caring, and clear, but several students strongly criticize professionalism, structure, and motivation.

Format shift

Online feedback is strongly positive, while .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

Assessment , and participation more than exams.

Format shift

and participation repeatedly, while online assessment evidence is unclear.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

14 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews are highly polarized, mixing strong praise for energy and care with , and professionalism.

Main concern

, and her loud or profane style may frustrate students.

What students said

“Grade and she is a .”
ENG103
“With little efforts, u can get easy A.”
ENGL1A
“ !!!!”
ENG103

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

The single online review is very positive and says she connects with students and supports life balance.

Main concern

Only one online review exists, so format-specific reliability is low.

What students said

“She is an AMAZING professor.”
ENGL101F
“She really connects with her students and wants them to succeed.”
ENGL101F

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and do not clearly prove detailed exam rules or proctoring policies.

Essay-Heavy GradingFinal Exam MentionedNo Clear Proctoring Evidence

Assessment risk

Varies

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and , but do not clearly prove exam format, open-book rules, or proctoring conditions.

Essay-Weighted GradeFinal Exam Mentioned
“Grade and she is a .”
ENG103
“There is 4 essays and then the .”
ENG1A

Online

The online review does not clearly prove webcam rules, .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“There are easier professors if you're just taking the course as another GE off the checklist.”

Voice snapshots generated from 15 reviews, highlighting the split between engaging teaching and . Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

68/100

“this professor was great, she talks a lot about interesting things and it's hard to get really bored.”

⚖️

32/100

“Grade and she is a .”

👍 Recommendation Risk

58/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • she made the class fun and
  • She is SO FUNNY!!!!
  • ; just in-class discussions.

Theme 2

📚 About Workload & Grades

  • Very heavy on the .
  • there is a lot to do like journals and reasearch journals
  • she does offer a good lots of

Theme 3

⚠️ About Fit

  • The structure overall of the class is not engaging enough
  • !!!!
  • I would 110% take her again.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

15

Recent reviews read by the AI

15

Lifetime ratings

70/100

Evidence confidence

The rating is moderately credible because 15 reviews span several years, but opinions are polarized and only one online review exists.

Inside 15 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 510
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 53
1 out of 52

Course coverage

ENG1036 reviews
ENGL1033 reviews
ENGL100F103F2 reviews
ENGL101F2 reviews
ENG1A1 review
Show 1 more courses
ENGL1A1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

13 reported outcomes

A range

6

A 6

B range

3

B+ 2 · B 1

C range

2

C+ 1 · C 1

D range

1

D+ 1

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values