AI Rate Professor

Journalism

Jessica Langlois

JOUR102 · JOUR222 · JOUR132 · JOURN101 · JOUR101 · 11 lifetime ratings

AI rating
60/100
RMP rating
3.6/5
Take again
54.55%
Difficulty
3.7

The decision

Take her if you are serious about journalism and , but if you need a light intro class.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerStrong feedbackResearch-heavyTough graderJournalism experienceSupportive if motivated
  • Students who care about journalism , and support.
  • Online reviews are sharply divided, with several students calling the workload intense and the .
  • This is not an easy class, but effort can pay off for motivated journalism students.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

48/100

A grades are possible, but students repeatedly mention tough grading, lots of , and needing to work for the grade.

Online evidence is more negative and workload-heavy, while .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

36/100

Students describe the class as intense, research-heavy, reading-heavy, and more advanced than expected for an intro course.

Online reviews make the course sound more demanding, while as useful for journalism students.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

55/100

Attendance is preferred and , but the reviews do not prove a .

Online students benefit from Zoom meetings before exams, while .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

58/100

She is recommended by , but several online students strongly disliked the workload and grading.

In-person reviews lean positive, while online and avoid.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

32/100

Multiple reviews and tags call her a though strong students can still earn A-range grades.

Format shift

Online reviews mention tough grading more often, while but .

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Students describe lots of , and an intro class that feels more advanced than expected.

Format shift

Online workload complaints are stronger, while and steady effort.

Teaching experience

Good

70/100

Her strongest , and availability, but negative online experiences lower the overall score.

Format shift

, while online feedback is polarized.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

35/100

Reviews , and assignments more than exams, though midterms and finals exist.

Format shift

Online mentions midterms and finals, while and journalism assignments.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

, and availability, though she still expects real work.

Main concern

Students not interested in journalism may find the work less worthwhile.

What students said

“gives a lot of feedback and .”
JOUR132
“Makes you work for your grade.”
JOUR101

Remote format

Online

6 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Online reviews are mixed, with recent praise for support and independence but older complaints , and poor experience.

Main concern

The online workload can feel intense and advanced for an intro course.

What students said

“This class is intense and research-heavy”
JOURN101
“Makes a intro class feel like an advanced class worth 5 units instead of 3 avoid if you can.”
JOUR101

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention midterms, finals, study guides, and , but do not clearly prove proctoring, webcam, Lockdown Browser, or open-book rules.

MidtermsFinalsStudy GuidesPre-Exam Zoom Meetings

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

format or .

Online

Online reviews mention midterms, finals, Zoom meetings before exams, and study guides but .

MidtermsFinalsStudy GuidesPre-Exam Zoom Meetings
“The only part where I struggled was in the Midterms and finals”
JOUR101
“Attend her zoom meetings prior to the exams. Also, she gives study guides.”
JOUR101

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“This class is intense and if you're passionate about journalism.”

Voice snapshots generated from 11 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and student fit. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

70/100

“Jessica is an amazing instructor with vast experience in the field of journalism.”

⚖️

32/100

“Makes you work for your grade.”

📚 Workload Intensity

28/100

“You won’t be sleeping much if .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching and Feedback

  • gives a lot of feedback and .
  • and insightful.
  • She gives as much support as she can

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Workload

  • This class is intense and research-heavy
  • Makes a intro class feel like an advanced class worth 5 units instead of 3 avoid if you can.
  • Makes you work for your grade.

Theme 3

❤️ About Fit

  • if you're passionate about journalism.
  • Anyone interested in journalism will benefit from taking her class.
  • Did not enjoy this class. .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

11

Recent reviews read by the AI

11

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Eleven reviews across several years and both formats provide , and grading.

Inside 11 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 56
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 52
1 out of 52

Course coverage

JOUR1014 reviews
JOUR1322 reviews
JOUR2222 reviews
JOURN1012 reviews
JOUR1021 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

7 reported outcomes

A range

5

A 4 · A- 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1