AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Abraham Romero-Hernandez

MATH171F · MATH151F · MATH120 · MATH040 · MATH015 · 250A · MATH041 · MATH142 · MATH041F · GEO20774 · MATH250B · MATH251 · MATH141 · MATH030 · MATH250 · MATH171 · 252B · MATH15F · MATH152F · MATH151 · 55 lifetime ratings

AI rating
26/100
RMP rating
2.2/5
Take again
21.74%
Difficulty
4.4

The decision

Take him only if you are strong in , and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerVery tough graderExam heavyStrict notationHomework-test mismatchMixed teaching clarity
  • Most students describe exams as much harder than lectures or homework.
  • , and sometimes arbitrary.
  • A minority of and office-hour help, but the overall recommendation level is low.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

An A is possible for strong students, but , and heavy self-study costs.

Both formats point to hard grading, with online reviews especially negative about exams being harder than instruction.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

25/100

The math content is often presented as , and .

Online and in-person reviews both describe difficult content, with unfamiliar material.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

35/100

as formally mandatory, but many students say skipping class makes passing much harder.

The , while online reviews do not clearly establish an attendance policy.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

24/100

Most students do not recommend him because strict grading and and helpfulness.

Online reviews are almost entirely avoidant, while experiences from strong or self-directed students.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

15/100

Students repeatedly say he deducts heavily for notation, small details, and answers that do not match his preferred work style.

Format shift

Both online and providing the strongest pattern across many courses.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

, but many students report lots of practice work that carries little grade value while .

Format shift

Online reviews mention difficult homework and exams, while for survival but not rewarded much.

Teaching experience

Poor

34/100

Some students praise his explanations and office-hour help, but many describe , rushed pacing, and .

Format shift

In-person reviews are more mixed, while online reviews are mostly negative about clarity and support.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

88/100

Grades are repeatedly described as driven by exams, finals, quizzes, and few .

Format shift

Both formats emphasize exams, and exams and a final.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

44 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews are mixed but mostly , and tests beyond taught material.

Main concern

The main risk is difficult exams worth most of the grade with limited forgiveness.

What students said

“ teaches.”
MATH152F
“ . Must do good on exams, quizzes, and all discussions to pass.”
MATH171

Remote format

Online

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are strongly negative, citing , and .

Main concern

Students say online exams and them for.

What students said

“ on ANYTHING”
MATH151F
“the !”
MATH151

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove proctoring or open-book rules, but as strict, difficult, and central to the grade.

Exam HeavyStrict GradingHarder Than HomeworkStrict NotationLimited Retakes

Assessment risk

Strict

18/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews do not clearly prove closed-book rules, but and hard test problems.

Exam HeavyStrict NotationNo RetakesHarder Than Lectures
“My grade however was based on 5 exams and 1 final.”
MATH251
“ , if you bomb an .”
MATH251

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove webcam, Lockdown Browser, open-book, or proctoring rules, but and .

Difficult ExamsStrict GradingHarder Than Homework
“ ”
MATH151F
“the !”
MATH151

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ teaches.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and support. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

34/100

“During lectures, he convolutes concepts that should be straight forward.”

⚖️

15/100

“He is really strict and tough in grading.”

🧪

18/100

“ and are basically impossible to pass.”

👍 Recommendation Level

24/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • understandable.
  • Lectures are not clear, homework does not , and test material isn't even from the lectures or homework.
  • Lectures were good but .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • Grades on an .
  • All test score averages are in the 30-40% range.
  • .
  • .

Theme 3

🧾 About Exams

  • teaches.
  • The . , and didn't have time to study outside class.
  • He puts problems that you havent even been taught into the exam.

Theme 4

❤️ About Support and Character

  • and relaxed though, just not the .
  • he gives student great assistance if they seek for his help.
  • He portrayed professionalism and relatability when it came to his demeanor.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

55

Lifetime ratings

92/100

Evidence confidence

The judgment is based on 50 reviews across many years and courses, with and exams.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 58
4 out of 54
3 out of 56
2 out of 511
1 out of 527

Course coverage

MATH1419 reviews
MATH152F6 reviews
MATH1515 reviews
MATH2504 reviews
MATH0413 reviews
Show 15 more courses
MATH1713 reviews
MATH171F3 reviews
250A2 reviews
MATH0302 reviews
MATH151F2 reviews
MATH2512 reviews
252B1 review
GEO207741 review
MATH0151 review
MATH0401 review
MATH041F1 review
MATH1201 review
MATH1421 review
MATH15F1 review
MATH250B1 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

40 reported outcomes

A range

7

A+ 2 · A 5

B range

7

B+ 2 · B 5

C range

4

C 3 · C- 1

D range

4

D+ 2 · D 2

F

2

F 2

No letter grade reported

16

Drop/Withdrawal 10 · Incomplete 2 · Not sure yet 3 · Rather not say 1