AI Rate Professor

Earth Science

Ji K Seung

PHYS222F · PHYS206 · PHYS222 · PHYS210 · PHYS211 · ASTRO1 · PHYS221 · 28 lifetime ratings

AI rating
76/100
RMP rating
3.9/5
Take again
68.97%
Difficulty
3.8

The decision

if you are willing to work hard in exchange for strong support and forgiving grade opportunities.

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaringExtra CreditHeavy HomeworkAccessibleHard Exams
  • Students consistently describe him as caring, available, and deeply invested in student success.
  • Physics remains demanding, with , and .
  • Grades are often made more manageable through curves, , resubmissions, dropped scores, and office-hour support.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

82/100

Physics requires steady work, but curves, , resubmissions, dropped scores, and .

grading, while online reviews confirm heavy work but less consistent grade clarity.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

34/100

The subject is repeatedly described as tough, with , and concept-heavy work.

Both formats describe physics as difficult, but online reviews more often mention fast teaching or .

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

48/100

Attendance and and sometimes tied to , but strict attendance is only clearly stated in one astronomy review.

and office hours, while online reviews emphasize help sessions and workload.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

76/100

Most students recommend him because he is caring and generous, though some warn that the workload and exams are intense.

, while online reviews are mixed but still include strong praise.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

88/100

Students repeatedly mention curves, , unlimited resubmissions, dropped scores, and .

Format shift

; online reviews mention less about specific grading policies.

Workload

Heavy

24/100

, and practice problems are frequent and often described as time-consuming.

Format shift

Both formats report heavy work, with online reviews especially mentioning many quizzes and .

Teaching experience

Good

78/100

He is widely praised as caring, helpful, and passionate, but .

Format shift

In-person reviews show stronger support and accessibility, while online reviews are more mixed on learning clarity.

Assessment method

Balanced

62/100

Grades appear , and rather than a single assessment type.

Format shift

, and exams; online reviews emphasize quizzes and homework.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

26 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are mostly positive, emphasizing caring support, office hours, resubmissions, , and hard but doable physics.

Main concern

Students must keep up with , and .

What students said

“Impossible not to get A w/ SO MANY EC”
PHYS211
“ , but the class is very doable if you stay on top of ur work”
PHYS206

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews are mixed, praising his care but , and uneven learning support.

Main concern

Online students may need to manage heavy work and some self-teaching.

What students said

“Lots of .”
PHYS210
“It's already a tough subject but this professor sets you up to succeed”
PHYS221

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are often hard, but , and a full page of notes make the overall exam style more standard than harsh.

Hard ExamsWeekly QuizzesCurvesDropped ScoresExam Notes Allowed

Assessment risk

Standard

52/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and quizzes, with , and one review saying a full page of notes is allowed.

Hard ExamsWeekly QuizzesCurvesDropped ScoresExam Notes Allowed
“ , but the class is very doable if you stay on top of ur work”
PHYS206
“gives you a full page of notes for exams”
PHYS211

Online

Online reviews mention many quizzes but do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, open-book, midterm, or .

Frequent Quizzes
“Lots of .”
PHYS210

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“The professor isn't difficult, the subject is.”

Voice snapshots generated from 29 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and . Credibility rating: High.

❤️ Student Support

78/100

“Hands down the kindest and most caring professor at FC.”

⚖️

88/100

“This is a tough class, but Mr. Ji is so tests, unlimited resubmissions for full points, and dropping lowest quizzes.”

📚 Workload Pressure

24/100

“Expect to put in more than 6 hours of work in this class per week”

Theme 1

❤️ About Character

  • Professor Ji is the most caring and patient professor I ever had.
  • He cares so much and wants to make sure everyone understands everything.
  • Super sweet professor who wants students to enjoy physics.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Impossible not to get A w/ SO MANY EC
  • , but the class is very doable if you stay on top of ur work
  • As long as and put in the work, getting an A is not difficult at all.

Theme 3

📚 About Workload

  • A lot of homework and .
  • Lots of homework however he allows for resubmission for .
  • Do the .

Theme 4

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He really cares about each student and tries to help with all of his free time dedicated to help sessions for all his students.
  • I didn't feel like he .
  • Teaching .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

29

Recent reviews read by the AI

28

Lifetime ratings

92/100

Evidence confidence

The analysis uses 29 detailed reviews across several years, many courses, and both formats, with strong consistency on support, workload, and grading.

Inside 29 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 517
4 out of 54
3 out of 50
2 out of 56
1 out of 52

Course coverage

PHYS22113 reviews
PHYS2105 reviews
PHYS2114 reviews
PHYS2063 reviews
PHYS2222 reviews
Show 2 more courses
ASTRO11 review
PHYS222F1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

27 reported outcomes

A range

10

A+ 1 · A 7 · A- 2

B range

7

B+ 3 · B 3 · B- 1

C range

4

C+ 1 · C 3

D range

1

D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

5

Drop/Withdrawal 3 · Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 1