AI Rate Professor

Photography

Karlie Castro-Kahn

PHOTO111F · PHOTO101 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
0/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
4.2

The decision

unless you can handle a heavy online class with little communication and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProImpossible to contactOverwhelming weekly workloadHarsh gradingPoor online supportUnclear guidance
  • Online students consistently report that the professor is nearly impossible to reach.
  • Workload is repeatedly described as excessive, with many weekly tasks and early projects.
  • as harsh, with missing components leading to zeros.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

5/100

Grades look very hard to earn because students report heavy work, harsh zeros, poor support, and multiple failing outcomes.

All evidence comes from online reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

22/100

Intro photography content is described as heavy, rushed, and treated like students should already be professionals.

Only online reviews exist, so the difficulty judgment reflects the online class experience.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

15/100

One review says she still marked many students absent despite .

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

0/100

because , and workload are all described as severe problems.

All recommendation evidence is online, and it is consistently negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

5/100

Students report , and grades of F, C-, or withdrawal.

Format shift

.

Workload

Overwhelming

3/100

Students repeatedly cite 7-15 weekly tasks, multiple early projects, and lots of homework.

Format shift

All workload evidence comes from online reviews.

Teaching experience

Awful

2/100

Students describe her as unreachable, bad at teaching, unprofessional, and unsupportive.

Format shift

All teaching-quality evidence comes from online reviews.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

8/100

Reviews focus on many weekly assignments and .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Remote format

Online

5 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are uniformly negative, , and weak support.

Main concern

Students say they cannot .

What students said

“Impossible to contact.”
photo111f
“10-15 things are due each week”
photo101
“7-9 assignments every single week”
29864

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove any exam format, proctoring rule, .

Exam Policy Unclear

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove the .

Exam Policy Unclear

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She is impossible to reach for an online class.”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading; credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

2/100

“Bad at teaching and .”

📚 Workload Pressure

3/100

“10-15 things are due each week”

⚖️

5/100

“If you have one component wrong or missing you get a 0”

Theme 1

📬 About Communication

  • Impossible to contact.
  • If you have questions itll take her 2 to 3 weeks to get back if she ever does
  • She is impossible to reach for an online class.

Theme 2

📚 About Workload

  • 10-15 things are due each week
  • 7-9 assignments every single week.
  • 3 projects due within the first 3 weeks of class.

Theme 3

⚖️ And Support

  • Bad at teaching and .
  • Sets her students up for failure
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Five recent online reviews are detailed, consistent, and uniformly , and teaching.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 55

Course coverage

298642 reviews
photo111f2 reviews
photo1011 review

Reported outcomes

F results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C- 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

2

F 2

No letter grade reported

2

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 1