AI Rate Professor

English

Darren Chiang-Schultheiss

ENGL100F036 · ENGLISH104 · ENG104 · ENGL103 · ENGL100 · ENG102 · ENGLISH100 · ENGL101 · ENGLISH102 · ENG100 · ENG103 · 112 lifetime ratings

AI rating
13/100
RMP rating
2.3/5
Take again
21.95%
Difficulty
4.3

The decision

unless you can tolerate disorganization, heavy writing, and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProDisorganizedTough graderLate feedbackHeavy writingUnclear instructions
  • Students repeatedly describe unclear , and .
  • The , and writing due on short notice.
  • A few students find him caring or helpful, but the .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

18/100

Even students who pass describe the class as , and costly in time, with and few graded items.

Both formats show low Easy A evidence, with online adding unpredictable modules and .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

The English content is not always inherently hard, but , and inconsistent organization make the course difficult.

Online reviews stress schedule chaos, while and assignments.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

12/100

Students report strict absence rules, late-work refusal, and repeated warnings that skipping class leads to failure.

, while online reviews also describe unforgiving deadlines and random posting times.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

18/100

Most students do not recommend him because , and heavy workload.

Both online and isolated positive experiences.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

15/100

Students repeatedly call him a and .

Format shift

Online and in-person reviews both mention harsh grading, with .

Workload

Overwhelming

12/100

The workload is described as lots of , and late-night assignments.

Format shift

Online students emphasize essays and module chaos, while and constant writing.

Teaching experience

Awful

22/100

Most comments describe unclear teaching, dull lectures, weak organization, and .

Format shift

Online reviews focus on poor course management, while and .

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

Assessment , and some tests rather than one single method.

Format shift

Online reviews mention modules, quizzes, discussions, and essays, while , and attendance.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

40 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews strongly criticize unclear , and delayed essay grades.

Main concern

Students and grades arrive too late to improve.

What students said

“Take this class if you .”
ENG100
“He waits until final grades are .”
ENG103
“3rd absence and youre dropped from the class.”
ENG100

Remote format

Online

10 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are mostly negative, citing late modules, lots of , and .

Main concern

Students say online scheduling is unpredictable and hard to manage around other responsibilities.

What students said

“Inconsistent module uploads, impossible to keep personal schedule”
ENG102
“lots of essays and theres an assumption you know all resources”
ENG100
“He does NOT accept late work”
ENG103

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews show quiz and test risk through pop quizzes and vague tests, but they do .

Pop QuizzesVague TestsEssay HeavyNo Clear Proctoring Evidence

Assessment risk

Standard

42/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and vague tests but do not clearly prove closed-book rules or formal proctoring policies.

Pop QuizzesVague Tests
“ as they were very vague.”
ENG102
“ and confusing.”
ENGLISH102

Online

Online reviews mention quizzes and pop quizzes but do not clearly prove webcam, Lockdown Browser, proctoring, open-book, or .

QuizzesPop QuizzesEssay Heavy
“Unpredictable in creating quizzes”
ENG102
“Beware of pop quizzes”
ENG100

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ .”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and recommendation risk. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

22/100

“He is such a odd teacher, he doesnt grade that much , and hes a !!”

📚 Workload Pressure

12/100

“There is .”

⚖️

15/100

“He waits until final grades are .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Half of what he would lecture about would never make sense and would leave us hanging most of the time.
  • His lectures are VERY dull and it's not an easy class to get through.
  • he just babbles about the same thing for hours.

Theme 2

📝

  • Tons of papers, but they're all on material that we go over thoroughly.
  • Lots and lots of writing
  • he also grades super tough and

Theme 3

⏰ About Organization & Deadlines

  • , and discussions.
  • He sends out new hw emails day before the class.
  • He emailed the class at 11:30pm the night before class and expected us to print out what he sent.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

112

Lifetime ratings

96/100

Evidence confidence

The evidence is highly credible because 50 reviews across online and many years.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 511
4 out of 517
3 out of 515
2 out of 526
1 out of 543

Course coverage

ENG10026 reviews
ENG1038 reviews
ENG1025 reviews
ENGL1003 reviews
ENGLISH1022 reviews
Show 6 more courses
ENG1041 review
ENGL100F0361 review
ENGL1011 review
ENGL1031 review
ENGLISH1001 review
ENGLISH1041 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

40 reported outcomes

A range

5

A+ 2 · A 2 · A- 1

B range

8

B+ 2 · B 4 · B- 2

C range

6

C+ 1 · C 4 · C- 1

D range

6

D+ 3 · D 2 · D- 1

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

14

Drop/Withdrawal 3 · Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 9 · Rather not say 1