Mihyung Kim

MATH144 · MATH151 · 9 lifetime ratings

AI rating: 57/100
RMP rating: 3.2/5
Take again: 60%
Difficulty: 3.6

The decision

if you already have a solid math foundation and can keep up with .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerFast-paced lecturesTest heavyPractice-aligned examsMixed teaching reviewsFoundation required

Student experience is sharply split between strong praise and severe avoidance warnings.
Successful students say exams and and helps.
Struggling students report rushed , and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

An A is possible with strong preparation because and exists, but weak foundations face high risk.

; there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

The course is challenging because students repeatedly mention fast lectures, rushed concepts, and calculus or trig demands.

All course .

Is attendance flexible?

Depends

58/100

Recommendation depends heavily on preparation, while several others strongly warn students away.

All and is highly polarized.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

50/100

Exams and quizzes often match review materials, but and low grades prevent a lenient label.

Format shift

praise and tough-grading complaints.

Workload

Heavy

30/100

Several students report lots of , and test-heavy structure, even though .

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Average

60/100

and engaging, while others say she rushes, makes errors, and .

Format shift

Only in-person reviews exist, and they are strongly split by student preparedness.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

85/100

Reviews repeatedly mention quizzes, tests, practice exams, review sheets, and .

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

10 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

class can work well for prepared students but can feel rushed and harsh for others.

Main concern

, and uneven explanations are the main risks.

What students said

“Lectures are fast, but if .”
MATH151

“ !!”
MATH151

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams appear standard and preparation-friendly because several students , but the class is still test heavy.

Practice-Aligned ExamsTest HeavyQuizzesReview Sheets

Assessment risk

Standard

65/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

tests or review sheets and include quizzes, but they do not clearly prove book policy or proctoring rules.

Practice-Aligned ExamsTest HeavyQuizzesReview Sheets

“ .”
MATH151

“ .”
MATH144

“ ”
MATH151

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice
“With a solid precalc foundation, you'll be just fine.”
Voice snapshots generated from 10 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and workload. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

60/100

“Lectures are fast, but if .”

📈 Grade Path

55/100

“ .”

⚠️ Difficulty Risk

35/100

“MATH CONCEPT IS NOT MEANT TO BE RUSHED!”

🧪

65/100

“ ”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

Lectures are fast, but if .
Not the .
Lectures are easy to understand and she makes class engaging

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

With a solid precalc foundation, you'll be just fine.
there is lots of homeworks and
Offers plenty of credit opportunities.

Theme 3

🧪

.
Quizzes mirror worksheets exactly, and .
she doesn't try

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

Recent reviews read by the AI

Lifetime ratings

75/100

Evidence confidence

, but opinions are highly polarized and no online evidence exists.

Inside 10 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55

4 out of 50

3 out of 51

2 out of 50

1 out of 54

Course coverage

MATH1516 reviews

MATH1444 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

10 reported outcomes

A range

A+ 1 · A 3 · A- 1

B range

B+ 1

C range

No reported values

D range

D+ 2 · D 1

F

No reported values

No letter grade reported

Rather not say 1

Mihyung Kim

x x x if you already have a solid math foundation and can keep up with x x x.

Four answers before you build your schedule.

FairEffort

Challenging

Recommended

Depends

See how this professor fits your week.

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

In person

Online

See what students actually said.

🎯 Teaching Quality

📈 Grade Path

⚠️ Difficulty Risk

🧪 x x

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

🧪 x x x x

See exactly what the AI read.

Quality ratings

Course coverage

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

A range

B range

C range

D range

F

No letter grade reported

if you already have a solid math foundation and can keep up with .

🧪

🧪