AI Rate Professor

Photography

Aaron Perez

PHOTO216 · PHOTO112 · PHOT216 · PHOTO216F · PHOT104 · PHOT101 · 15 lifetime ratings

AI rating
89/100
RMP rating
4.7/5
Take again
93.75%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

if you are serious about improving photography and , and consistent project work.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerGreat feedbackPhotography mentorParticipation mattersWorkload heavyStrict attendance
  • Students praise Perez for deep photography knowledge, strong critiques, and accessibility.
  • The course often requires steady work, participation, lectures, and .
  • Grades are usually high with effort, but attendance, deadlines, critiques, and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

72/100

High grades are common, but they , and responding to critiques.

In-person reviews show a clearer path to strong grades, while online reviews include .

Is the course easy?

Standard

54/100

Photography concepts are teachable for beginners, but the workload, critiques, and advanced expectations make the class substantive.

Online and in-person reviews both mention useful lectures, but and attendance.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

20/100

and being on time.

Attendance concerns come from in-person reviews, while online reviews .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

92/100

Students recommend him because , and accessibility help them improve meaningfully.

Both formats are mostly positive, but .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

68/100

He offers redos and , but students say full credit can be hard and critiques can be demanding.

Format shift

In-person reviews mention redos and , while online grading evidence includes one complaint about slow returns.

Workload

Heavy

38/100

Students repeatedly mention lots of work, long lectures, projects, and detailed submission expectations.

Format shift

Both formats mention workload, with and participation.

Teaching experience

Excellent

91/100

Most reviews describe him as , and especially strong at giving useful feedback.

Format shift

Teaching praise is strong in both formats, though one online review sharply criticizes clarity and .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

The class is mainly driven , and portfolio-style work rather than exams.

Format shift

Both formats emphasize assignments and critiques, with .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

11 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews , and practical growth, with work and attendance as the main costs.

Main concern

Students need to attend on time, participate, and keep up with a lot of work.

What students said

“He gives a bunch of work, but it's not hard to do, and he gives a lot of time to complete it.”
PHOTO112
“His critiques are brutal, but .”
PHOT101

Remote format

Online

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Online reviews are mostly positive about expertise, lectures, resources, and feedback, but and .

Main concern

Online students may struggle if .

What students said

“The course material was very good, well thought-out, planned and presented.”
PHOTO112
“ an assignment.”
PHOT104

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mainly describe projects, critiques, and assignments, while .

Assignment DrivenFinal ProjectNo Clear Exam Policy

Assessment risk

Varies

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

student's own but do not clearly prove broader exam rules or proctoring policies.

Final On Your OwnAssignment Driven
“Finding clients to photograph and even a .”
PHOT104

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“His critiques push you to be better with every photo you submit.”

Voice snapshots generated from 16 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

91/100

“His critiques push you to be better with every photo you submit.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

92/100

“Bro is a good teacher. 10/10 would recommend and .”

🧾 Workload Reality

38/100

“He gives a bunch of work, but it's not hard to do, and he gives a lot of time to complete it.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫

  • .
  • His critiques are brutal, but .
  • .

Theme 2

📚 About Workload & Effort

  • He does assign a lot of work but it is never too much as long as you keep up with the work.
  • There is a decent amount of work and you really have to pay attention to the video lectures because everything has to be turned in a certain way.
  • Listen, participate and push .

Theme 3

🌐 About Online Experience

  • Even with these difficulties of online photography classes, he makes it a very productive experience!
  • His lectures may be a bit on the long side, but I learned so much from each one.
  • Doesn't return grades and work in an amount of time for you to add the critiques to the next assignment.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

16

Recent reviews read by the AI

15

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 16 recent and detailed reviews cover both online and .

Inside 16 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 513
4 out of 52
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

PHOTO1126 reviews
PHOT1014 reviews
PHOT1042 reviews
PHOT2162 reviews
PHOTO2161 review
Show 1 more courses
PHOTO216F1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

14 reported outcomes

A range

13

A+ 3 · A 10

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values