AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Daphne MacLean

MATH30F · MATH15F · MATH30 · 010F · MATH15 · MATH100F · MATH151 · MATH141F · MATH100 · 27 lifetime ratings

AI rating
58/100
RMP rating
3.5/5
Take again
61.54%
Difficulty
2.6

The decision

Take her if you like structured lectures and routine practice, but if .

Best fit · Effort For RewardHelpful for some studentsLecture heavyTest heavyMixed teaching clarityHomework routine
  • many students praise her kindness and , while others say lectures and .
  • The class can be manageable or easy for , and practice consistently.
  • Main risks , and limited help or unclear teaching in negative reviews.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

High grades are possible through attendance, homework, review sheets, and studying, but exams and .

because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

56/100

Some students find the math simple and well explained, but others report fast coverage, poor alignment, and difficult tests.

All course-easiness evidence is in-person and varies heavily by course and student math background.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

42/100

Reviews do not prove a , but many students say missing lectures will leave you behind.

, and as important for learning and grades.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

54/100

Recommendation depends on learning style because students are split between calling her helpful and .

Only in-person evidence exists, and that evidence is strongly polarized.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

and dropped exams, while others complain about tough grading and .

Format shift

available.

Workload

Moderate

49/100

and useful for some students, but multiple reviews call it excessive or say class .

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Average

58/100

She is often described as kind and , but many students report , weak help, and poor alignment between notes and homework.

Format shift

All teaching evidence is in-person and highly inconsistent across courses and years.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

82/100

Many reviews emphasize midterms, finals, frequent tests, scantrons, and .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

27 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

All evidence is from in-person reviews, which show a sharply mixed experience across courses and years.

Main concern

Students disagree , so fit matters a lot.

What students said

“Easy to understand and concise in lectures.”
MATH151
“ but a terrible math teacher.”
MATH151

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are central to the course, with review sheets and some partial credit, but several reviews describe frequent or high-stakes testing.

Multiple MidtermsFinal ExamReview SheetsOne-Sided Index Card MentionedFrequent Tests

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

allowed index card for one final, and frequent testing, but do not clearly prove proctoring policy.

Multiple MidtermsFinal ExamReview SheetsOne-Sided Index CardFrequent Tests
“4 midterms and 1 final all midterms are given a review sheet.”
MATH151
“Allowed one sided index for final, but .”
MATH141F

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you enjoy routine, and .”

Voice snapshots generated from 27 reviews, highlighting polarized themes in teaching, testing, workload, and fit. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

58/100

“Easy to understand and concise in lectures.”

👍 Recommendation Fit

54/100

“Stay away from her if you have difficulty with math or like to get help on difficult problems.”

📚 Workload and Tests

49/100

“ and not enough time to complete it.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She has a way of explaining things that is almost elementary, but without being condescending to her students.
  • The lectures and the .
  • She breaks the stuff down to make sure everyone understand and takes time on it.

Theme 2

🧮 About Difficulty and Grades

  • Do the HW and attend lectures and you'll pass.
  • She graded exams VERY liberally, it seems like she .
  • literally nothing matters but the final it is 200 points if you dont pass that you dont pass the class.

Theme 3

📌 About Class Routine

  • Make sure to study as well for upcoming tests.
  • She lets you do HW in class.
  • so .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

27

Recent reviews read by the AI

27

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

The rating is credible because 27 reviews span many years and include detailed but .

Inside 27 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 513
4 out of 55
3 out of 51
2 out of 53
1 out of 55

Course coverage

MATH1009 reviews
MATH1516 reviews
MATH141F2 reviews
MATH152 reviews
MATH15F2 reviews
Show 5 more courses
MATH302 reviews
010F1 review
122851 review
MATH100F1 review
MATH30F1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

16 reported outcomes

A range

9

A+ 3 · A 6

B range

2

B+ 2

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

4

Not sure yet 2 · Rather not say 2