AI Rate Professor

English

William Molina

Courses not reported · 8 lifetime ratings

AI rating
40/100
RMP rating
2.8/5
Take again
37.5%
Difficulty
3.4

The decision

if you can handle blunt criticism and independent writing work without needing a .

Best fit · Self Taught ProHarsh feedbackPolarizing personalityAccessible to someWriting heavyTough grader
  • Students sharply disagree and unprofessional treatment.
  • The class can reward effort with good grades, but the emotional cost of .
  • and serious warnings, while the only online review is negative.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

Good grades are possible, but , and unclear structure keep the A from feeling effortless.

The online review gives no easy-grade support, while in-person reviews show mixed grades with some and extensions.

Is the course easy?

Standard

43/100

The writing work is not extreme, but , and criticism make the course feel moderately challenging.

Online evidence emphasizes confusing wording, while , and .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

Reviews do not clearly prove a strict attendance policy, and .

Neither format clearly proves attendance rules; flexibility .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

42/100

Recommendation depends on whether as constructive or disrespectful.

The only online review is negative, while and strong warnings.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

35/100

Multiple students call him tough or harsh, though some still earned high grades and mention or extensions.

Format shift

; the online review focuses more on tone and clarity.

Workload

Heavy

35/100

The course involves essays, reading, and revision-heavy feedback, with some students explicitly citing lots of homework.

Format shift

In-person reviews give the clearest workload evidence, while the .

Teaching experience

Poor

42/100

His teaching is polarized, but , and unprofessional comments pull the score down.

Format shift

Online evidence is negative, while and severe feedback concerns.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

, and grading rather than exams.

Format shift

Both formats point to .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

7 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are highly polarized, with some students praising humor and access while and .

Main concern

Students may find the criticism harsh, sarcastic, or demoralizing.

What students said

“While his criticism can be harsh, it's always well-intentioned.”
10085
“This professor is by far the rudest professor i've encountered.”
10085
“you can ask for extensions and he will grant them.”
10085

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The and rude, unprofessional communication.

Main concern

Tone and clarity of .

What students said

“The wording he and hard to understand.”
10085
“Responds to students unprofessionally and rudely.”
10085

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove a specific exam format, proctoring policy, open-book policy, midterm format, or .

Exam policy not clearly provenEssay-focused assessmentReading-based coursework

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and assignments, but do not clearly prove exam format.

Exam policy not clearly provenEssaysReading
“there are 4 essays you got to do”
10085
“Yeah you have to read 2 books”
10085

Online

The online review discusses assignment wording and feedback, but .

Exam policy not clearly provenAssignment wording
“The wording he and hard to understand.”
10085

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“While his criticism can be harsh, it's always well-intentioned.”

Voice snapshots generated from 8 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

42/100

“The wording he and hard to understand.”

⚖️

35/100

“I've never felt so degraded by a professor in my life until I took this class.”

👍 Recommendation Split

42/100

“He makes lectures entertaining and genuinely cares about his students' success.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He makes lectures entertaining and genuinely cares about his students' success.
  • sarcastic remarks that own intellectual superiority than in helping students learn.
  • Amazing Teacher, laid back, and all.

Theme 2

✍️

  • While his criticism can be harsh, it's always well-intentioned.
  • You would get a good grade on the essay but when you look on the .

Theme 3

📚 About Workload

  • there are 4 essays you got to do
  • Yeah you have to read 2 books
  • just make sure you pull your weight and do the work!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

8

Recent reviews read by the AI

8

Lifetime ratings

78/100

Evidence confidence

Eight recent reviews give detailed and consistent evidence of polarization, though the online sample has only one review.

Inside 8 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 53

Course coverage

100858 reviews

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

7 reported outcomes

A range

2

A+ 1 · A 1

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Rather not say 3