AI Rate Professor

Film & Television

Mark Columbus

CRTV120 · CRTV120F · CRTV127 · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
54/100
RMP rating
3.2/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
2.3

The decision

He is a reasonable pick for an easier grade, especially in person, but if .

Best fit · Easy A HunterEasy gradingDisorganized onlineHelpful feedbackLight workloadMixed teaching quality
  • as easy, but online reviews strongly criticize organization and lecture quality.
  • In-person reviews are , and light workload.
  • The course is usually manageable if work is submitted on time, though teaching clarity can be uneven.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

82/100

Multiple students earned A grades and if writing or analysis work is submitted on time.

, while in-person reviews also support easy outcomes when work is submitted on time.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

The workload and grading are light, but complex explanations and .

Online reviews find the course easy but disorganized, while lectures.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

60/100

Reviews do not clearly prove a , though online students mention few real meetings and prerecorded lectures.

Online evidence suggests limited live meeting requirements, while .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

55/100

and helpful in-person support than for consistently strong teaching.

In-person reviews lean positive, while online reviews are .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

80/100

, though late work may not be accepted.

Format shift

, but online reviews warn that late film analysis is not accepted.

Workload

Light

72/100

, though some reviews call the course writing heavy.

Format shift

In-person workload is mostly light, while online , and homework.

Teaching experience

Average

52/100

He can be caring and , but online reviews describe poor organization and weak lectures.

Format shift

evidence, which is mostly negative.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

Assessment appears centered on writing, film analysis, assignments, and quizzes rather than major exams.

Format shift

Online reviews mention film analysis and quizzes, while and feedback.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are mostly positive, describing him as , and generally easy if writing is submitted on time.

Main concern

.

What students said

“he's also willing to help with career options or .”
CRTV120F
“so long as you turned in your writing on time you were golden.”
CRTV120F
“writing heavy. ”
CRTV120F

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

, but organization, lectures, meetings, and technical handling are poor.

Main concern

Disorganization and weak online teaching are the main concerns.

What students said

“ but ”
CRTV120
“ but his lectures are a joke.”
CRTV127
“ ”
CRTV127

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention quizzes and assignments but do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, open-book policy, midterm format, or .

Exam policy not clearly provenQuizzesFilm analysisWriting assignments

Assessment risk

Varies

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews emphasize writing and submitted assignments, but .

Writing assignmentsExam policy not clearly proven
“so long as you turned in your writing on time you were golden.”
CRTV120F
“writing heavy.”
CRTV120F

Online

Online reviews mention film analysis and quizzes, but .

QuizzesFilm analysisExam policy not clearly proven
“the only work is film analysis and quizzes”
CRTV120

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ but his lectures are a joke.”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

52/100

“Good to hangout with as a film advisor, but teaching is meh.”

📈 Easy Grade

82/100

“ but ”

🧭 Organization Risk

52/100

“ as he had to move zoom meetings to another week.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • he's also willing to help with career options or .
  • his class is enjoyable and easy to follow.
  • but his lectures are a joke.

Theme 2

📈 About Grades & Work

  • so long as you turned in your writing on time you were golden.
  • you don't get hw often so it's pretty light.
  • writing heavy.

Theme 3

💻 About Online Format

  • .
  • No real meetings other than is prerecorded lectures.
  • I feel he needs to have more meetings for screenwriting class.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

Six reviews provide useful format contrast, but the sample is small and several pandemic-era comments may reflect unusual course conditions.

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 52
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

CRTV120F4 reviews
CRTV1201 review
CRTV1271 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

3

A 3

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values