AI Rate Professor

Architecture

Tommy Reyes

ARCH114 · ARCH227 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
56/100
RMP rating
2.5/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
2.5

The decision

if and rely on feedback more than structure.

Best fit · Self Taught ProHelpful FeedbackUnclear ExpectationsMixed Teaching QualityPresentation Heavy
  • Reviews and severe concerns about organization and expertise.
  • Grades reported are high, but and inconsistent criteria.
  • Online reviews mention useful Zoom lectures but also outdated modules and weak access to materials.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

76/100

Reported grades are high and one student calls him relatively easy, but .

Both online and in person evidence show high grades, while .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

66/100

The content sounds manageable and presentation based, though poor structure and outdated materials can make it harder than needed.

Online difficulty comes from outdated materials, while in person difficulty comes from presentations and inconsistent organization.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

One in person review , and no review clearly supports flexibility.

The only; online reviews do not clearly discuss attendance rules.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

52/100

Recommendations are split because and passion while others strongly question his competence and organization.

Both formats are mixed, with and poor course value and in person reviews split between passion and avoidance.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

56/100

High reported grades suggest students can do well, but and .

Format shift

Online reviews mention unclear expectations, while in and inconsistent grading criteria.

Workload

Moderate

58/100

Work appears presentation and module based rather than overwhelming, but .

Format shift

Online workload is affected by outdated modules, while in person work centers on presentations.

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

Students praise feedback and passion, but serious comments describe weak expertise, poor communication, and disorganization.

Format shift

Online and doubts about expertise; in person teaching is split between passion and poor reliability.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Reviews emphasize presentations, modules, rubrics, and .

Format shift

Both formats point mainly to assignment-based evaluation, with .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In person reviews are divided between a passionate, accessible teacher and a .

Main concern

In and schedule reliability may vary heavily.

What students said

“changes class time or ”
ARCH227
“Tommy is passionate about Architecture so he teaches from the heart.”
ARCH114

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online students report helpful Zoom lectures and feedback, but also outdated modules and doubts about course value.

Main concern

Online materials and .

What students said

“the but a LOT of the modules are outdated”
ARCH114
“watching youtube would be better”
ARCH114

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, open-book policy, or .

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In person reviews do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, open-book policy, or .

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, open-book policy, or .

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Also the but he gives good feedback.”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

55/100

“Tommy is passionate about Architecture so he teaches from the heart.”

⚖️

56/100

“assignments do not seem to follow any type of .”

👍 Recommendation Level

52/100

“ !”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • the
  • Tommy is passionate about Architecture so he teaches from the heart.
  • Reyes does not know anything about architecture or software.

Theme 2

📈 About Grades & Work

  • Also the but he gives good feedback.
  • assignments do not seem to follow any type of .
  • He is relatively easy but he will challenge you

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Four reviews across two formats give useful but highly polarized evidence over a long time span.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 52
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

ARCH1143 reviews
ARCH2271 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

3

A+ 1 · A 2

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values