AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Jaqueline Margo

MATHMATH · MATH40 · MATH010 · MATH20 · MATH120 · MATH15 · MATH10 · MATH141F · MATH015 · MATH130 · MATH100 · 32 lifetime ratings

AI rating
83/100
RMP rating
3.9/5
Take again
70%
Difficulty
2.4

The decision

if you want a and are willing to keep up with homework and ask questions.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyCaring math supportHomework heavyClear lecturesMistakes in classFair test prep
  • Most students praise her patience, kindness, and ability to make math more understandable.
  • and important, but it often prepares students directly for tests.
  • A minority of reviews strongly criticize organization, mistakes, and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

72/100

An A is realistic with attendance, homework, and studying, but the and .

Online evidence suggests flexible credit, while and test preparation.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

70/100

She , and patient help, though some students find the pace or exams difficult.

The single online review is positive, while but more mixed.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

48/100

Attendance is not always described as formally mandatory, but missing class or .

Online participation was not forced, while success.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

76/100

Most students recommend her because she is caring and and organization.

Both formats are positive overall, but online evidence is only one review and and more mixed.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

68/100

as reasonable, with credit for work and , but older reviews report tough grading in some sections.

Format shift

The online , while in-person reviews range from fair to tough.

Workload

Moderate

46/100

and sometimes heavy, but students often say it is manageable and directly useful for exams.

Format shift

Both the online review and .

Teaching experience

Good

79/100

She is widely described as , and patient, though several students report mistakes, confusion, and organization problems.

Format shift

Online evidence is strongly positive, while .

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

, and finals, with homework often used to prepare for exams.

Format shift

, while in-person reviews give more detail on tests and homework.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

31 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person reviews mostly describe a notes, and occasional organization or accuracy problems.

Main concern

The main concern is inconsistency, especially mistakes during instruction and tougher experiences in some lower-level math sections.

What students said

“She made this tough subject easy to understand.”
MATH120
“ ”
MATH015
“Homework heavy on pearson, about 15-20 problems due but managable”
MATH141F

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

The single online review is very positive, describing clear pacing, optional participation, and .

Main concern

The main concern is that the online evidence is limited to one review.

What students said

“Encouraged participation, but was never forced.”
MATH141F
“If the you to email her to possibly receive credit.”
MATH141F

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

note cards, review-aligned tests, and some tough-test complaints.

Notecard AllowedTests Similar To ReviewDrops Lowest Test ScoreTough Tests In Some Sections

Assessment risk

Standard

67/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews , and some tough exams, but do not clearly prove proctoring or book policy.

Notecard AllowedTests Similar To ReviewDrops Lowest Test ScoreTough Tests
“She allows one note card for class.”
MATH120
“ .”
MATH100
“ ”
MATH015

Online

The online review does not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, open-book, take-home, midterm, or .

Online Grading Correction
“If the you to email her to possibly receive credit.”
MATH141F

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She made this tough subject easy to understand.”

Voice snapshots generated from 32 , and grading fairness. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

79/100

“She made this tough subject easy to understand.”

📚 Workload Reality

46/100

“Homework heavy on pearson, about 15-20 problems due but managable”

👍 Recommendation Rate

76/100

“If you're not good at . Margo.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • she is so good at giving lectures and explaining hard topics
  • She is really a hands on teacher, shes there for you.
  • nice professor but terrible at teaching. often messes up and makes a lot of erros when teaching.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • To get an A:go to class, do HW, & study every paper she gives during class before the exam.
  • Class structure was fair and straight forward.
  • and she grades very tough too.

Theme 3

🧮

  • Homework heavy on pearson, about 15-20 problems due but managable
  • Allows us to bring a .
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

32

Recent reviews read by the AI

32

Lifetime ratings

91/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 32 reviews across many years provide detailed and , and grading.

Inside 32 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 518
4 out of 56
3 out of 53
2 out of 51
1 out of 54

Course coverage

MATH1206 reviews
MATH156 reviews
MATH0155 reviews
MATH1003 reviews
MATH141F3 reviews
Show 7 more courses
MATH102 reviews
MATH402 reviews
230341 review
MATH0101 review
MATH1301 review
MATH201 review
MATHMATH1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

13 reported outcomes

A range

6

A+ 1 · A 5

B range

3

B+ 1 · B 2

C range

1

C 1

D range

1

D+ 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 1