AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Thanh (kim) Hoang

MATH2304 · CALC130 · MATH141 · MATH004 · MATHA185 · MATH20 · MATHN06 · MATH129 · ALGEB141 · MATH150 · MATH130 · 27 lifetime ratings

AI rating
16/100
RMP rating
2.2/5
Take again
20%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

unless you can teach yourself math, keep up with a fast pace, and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProHard to understandFast paced lecturesStrict gradingHeavy homeworkTest heavy
  • Most students report and getting questions answered clearly.
  • as harsh, especially when work does not follow her exact steps.
  • A few students succeed with prior knowledge or strong effort, but the overall recommendation level is very low.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Getting an A usually requires strong prior knowledge, constant work, and following her exact solution steps.

because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

24/100

Math content becomes much harder because lectures move quickly and many students cannot understand the explanations.

because there are no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

12/100

Reviews say missing class leaves students behind and and homework.

because there are no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

20/100

Most students do not recommend her because , and support frustrating.

because there are no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

15/100

Many students say , and exams even when concepts are understood.

Format shift

online evidence available.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Reviews frequently mention lots of , and a fast class pace that makes falling behind costly.

Format shift

All workload evidence is from in-person reviews, with no online evidence available.

Teaching experience

Awful

22/100

Most comments describe unclear lectures, poor communication, frustration with questions, and weak classroom support.

Format shift

All teaching evidence is from in-person reviews, with no online evidence available.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

82/100

, and exams more than projects or papers.

Format shift

All assessment evidence is from in-person reviews, with no online evidence available.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

27 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are mostly negative, citing unclear , and strict grading.

Main concern

Students repeatedly say lectures are hard to understand and if the work does not match her method.

What students said

“She knew what she was doing for herself but did not know how to teach it to everyone else.”
MATH130
“Even if you understand the concept and may have the correct answer, she will deduct points from the steps leading to the correct answer.”
MATH130

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The and test-heavy, but reviews do not clearly prove closed-book, proctoring, webcam, or Lockdown Browser policies.

Test HeavyWeekly TestsStrict Step GradingHard Exams

Assessment risk

Strict

25/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and strict step-based grading, but do not clearly prove closed-book or proctoring policies.

Test HeavyWeekly TestsStrict Step GradingHard Exams
“ ”
MATH004
“ if you miss lectures in-class”
MATH130
“5 points towards your exam if you complete the study guide!”
MATH130

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She knew what she was doing for herself but did not know how to teach it to everyone else.”

Voice snapshots generated from 27 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and exams. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

22/100

“Lectures consist of her going through a ; barely explaining anything.”

⚖️

15/100

“she will deduct points from the steps leading to the correct answer.”

👍 Recommendation Level

20/100

“Overall .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • she ineffectively answers questions asked and has terrible notes/lectures.
  • It is very difficult to understand her, she does not really answer questions, and only goes around to check up on those in the class which already understand the material.
  • She rushes through everything and expects us to magically know everything.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • Seriously one of the toughest math classes I've ever taken, only because of .
  • She grades everything from homework, quizzes, and tests by hand as well as to the letter.
  • Other students struggled over the amount of homework.

Theme 3

🧾 About Exams and Workload

  • if you miss lectures in-class
  • She assigns L0TS of hw, worth about minimum 2 hours.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

27

Recent reviews read by the AI

27

Lifetime ratings

92/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 27 in-person reviews span many years and consistently report the same problems despite a few positive exceptions.

Inside 27 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 52
3 out of 52
2 out of 58
1 out of 511

Course coverage

MATH13012 reviews
MATH204 reviews
CALC1302 reviews
MATH0042 reviews
ALGEB1411 review
Show 6 more courses
MATH1291 review
MATH1411 review
MATH1501 review
MATH23041 review
MATHA1851 review
MATHN061 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

11 reported outcomes

A range

5

A+ 2 · A 3

B range

1

B 1

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

4

Drop/Withdrawal 2 · Rather not say 2