AI Rate Professor

English

Vanessa Ferreira

ENGL60 · ENGLISH103 · ENGL103 · ENGL100 · ENG59 · ENG103 · 13 lifetime ratings

AI rating
83/100
RMP rating
4.3/5
Take again
87.5%
Difficulty
2.2

The decision

if you want structured writing help, but be cautious online because the only .

Best fit · Effort For RewardClear writing instructionHelpful feedbackCaring and availableEssay heavyAttendance matters
  • Most , and supportive writing guidance.
  • The class is usually manageable, but , and .
  • One online review is strongly negative and , so format matters.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

In-person students usually find , and effort, but the online review warns of harsh grading.

, while the only online review describes grading as harsh and unclear.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

The course is generally easy to follow because , though essays and reading still require consistent work.

In-person reviews call the class simple and clear, while the only online review suggests the writing expectations are harder to satisfy.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

only a small number of absences allowed.

Attendance rules are supported by in-person reviews, while the online review .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

86/100

, and helpful writing support, despite one severe online complaint.

, while the only online review is strongly negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

62/100

and helpful chances to improve, but the online review reports harsh and inconsistent grading.

Format shift

and effort-based, while the single online review describes it as harsh.

Workload

Moderate

65/100

, and group activities, but most students call it manageable.

Format shift

In-person reviews provide most workload evidence, while the online .

Teaching experience

Good

84/100

Most students , and supportive teaching, with one online review as a major negative outlier.

Format shift

In-person teaching reviews are very positive, while the only and .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

18/100

The class is centered on essays, writing assignments, reading responses, journals, debates, and conferences rather than exams.

Format shift

Both formats discuss writing assignments, but detailed assessment .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

13 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are mostly positive, , and a supportive classroom.

Main concern

Students should expect essays, reading, group work, and limited allowed absences.

What students said

“Her teaching style was easy to follow.”
ENGL100
“Lots of reading, annotating, and papers but overall it is a simple class.”
ENG103

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

The only online review is , and disagreement with the rubric.

Main concern

Online grading may feel strict and .

What students said

“Very vague or .”
ENGL100
“She .”
ENGL100

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment appears writing-heavy rather than exam-heavy, and reviews do not clearly prove proctoring, .

Essay BasedIn-Class EssaysOutside EssaysNo Clear Exam Proctoring Evidence

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

80/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and debates, but do not clearly prove a formal exam policy.

Outside EssaysIn-Class EssaysDebates
“4 Outside Essays 2 In Class Essays 4 In Class Debates (Informal)”
ENGLISH103
“Lots of reading, annotating, and papers but overall it is a simple class.”
ENG103

Online

The but does not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, open-book, quiz, midterm, or .

Essay Grading
“Graded me so harshly throughout no matter how .”
ENGL100

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Her teaching style was easy to follow.”

Voice snapshots generated from 14 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

84/100

“Her teaching style was easy to follow.”

📝 Writing Support

84/100

“Her lectures were great and .”

⚖️

62/100

“Make sure you implement the specific writing strategies mentioned in the textbook or you risk getting a flat out 0 on the assignment.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She explained things clearly and we did a lot of activities to help us prep for essays.
  • Her teaching methods make the class easy and and simple.
  • i thought english was gonna be hard but after taking english class with her she makes it so much easier.

Theme 2

📚 About Workload and Attendance

  • Lots of reading, annotating, and papers but overall it is a simple class.
  • You are allowed to be absent 2 days.
  • The class was pretty easy as a whole.

Theme 3

⚖️ and Feedback

  • Very vague or .
  • she allows you to redo the .
  • and she is always available when you need help.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

14

Recent reviews read by the AI

13

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 14 reviews provide detailed themes, though online confidence is limited by only one online review.

Inside 14 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 510
4 out of 51
3 out of 52
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ENGL1004 reviews
ENGL1033 reviews
ENGL603 reviews
ENGLISH1032 reviews
ENG1031 review
Show 1 more courses
ENG591 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

11 reported outcomes

A range

5

A+ 1 · A 3 · A- 1

B range

5

B+ 1 · B 4

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Rather not say 1