AI Rate Professor

Reading

Andrea Alarcon

READ036 · READ56 · READ056 · READING036 · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
63/100
RMP rating
3.5/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
2.7

The decision

if you can tolerate possible disorganization and verify how the current section is run.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyHelpful when askedDisorganized recentlyMixed gradingLow homework in older classes
  • as helpful, nice, and .
  • The two 2024 reviews are sharply negative and describe disorganization, heavy work, and .
  • Evidence is split by time and format, so the current experience is uncertain.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

Older students earned good grades with modest work, but recent F grades and .

Online evidence is negative and workload-heavy, while but mixed by year.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

62/100

The course , but recent comments suggest the class can feel harder because of poor structure.

The only online review signals more burden, while .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do .

Neither online .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

52/100

, but the newest reviews warn against taking her.

, while in-person evidence is mostly positive except for the newest review.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

45/100

Grades range from A+ to F, and .

Format shift

The online review reports an F and heavy work, while but harsh in the newest one.

Workload

Moderate

50/100

, but the online review reports lots of homework and papers.

Format shift

Online workload evidence is heavy, while recent test-heavy review.

Teaching experience

Average

60/100

She is often described as helpful and nice, but recent comments call the class messy and disorganized.

Format shift

Online teaching evidence is negative, while but weakened by the recent complaint.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Comments , and quizzes without one assessment type dominating all reviews.

Format shift

, and quizzes, while in-person evidence includes reading and tests.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

and describe her as helpful and easy, but one recent review is very negative.

Main concern

.

What students said

“Messy as hell and !”
READING036
“not that and she is willing to help if you ask”
READ056
“If you have the !”
READING036

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The only online review is strongly negative and and quizzes.

Main concern

The and workload-heavy.

What students said

“ !”
READ036
“Lots of homework”
READ036

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention tests and quizzes, but they do not clearly prove open-book rules, proctoring, webcam use, or closed-book requirements.

Test HeavyPop Quizzes MentionedExam policy unclear

Assessment risk

Varies

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews mention test-heavy work but do not clearly prove the .

Test Heavy
“Test heavy”
READING036

Online

The online review mentions pop quizzes but does not clearly prove proctoring, webcam, open-book, or .

Pop Quizzes Mentioned
“Beware of pop quizzes”
READ036

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Messy as hell and !”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 reviews, highlighting teaching, workload, and recommendation themes. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

60/100

“she is such a nice women and is a super great teacher”

⚖️

45/100

“ ”

👍 Recommendation Split

52/100

“If you have the !”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • great teacher helpful and fun easy class
  • she is willing to help if you ask
  • Messy as hell and !

Theme 2

📚 About Workload

  • not that
  • Lots of homework
  • So many papers

Theme 3

👍 About Recommendations

  • !
  • if I could!
  • !

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Six reviews provide some useful detail, but most positive reviews are old and the .

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

READ0362 reviews
READING0362 reviews
READ0561 review
READ561 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

6 reported outcomes

A range

2

A+ 1 · A 1

B range

2

B+ 1 · B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

2

F 2

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values