AI Rate Professor

Drafting

Benjamen Smith

DRAFT140 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
48/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
1.5

The decision

if you can handle independent practice and a teaching style that may not answer questions directly.

Best fit · Self Taught ProPolarizing instructorClear for someSelf-teaching riskLow stated difficultyLimited evidence
  • The two reviews are completely split between outstanding instruction and a very poor learning experience.
  • Difficulty ratings are low, but one student withdrew after feeling unsupported.
  • The small review count makes any conclusion uncertain.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

The low difficulty ratings suggest the class can be manageable, but one withdrawal shows the A path is not reliable for everyone.

because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

The course seems technically manageable for some students but can be hard if demonstrations .

All course difficulty evidence is in person, with no online comparison.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

The reviews do not clearly .

, and there are no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

50/100

Recommendation is split exactly between a favorite-teacher review and a .

All recommendation evidence is in person, with no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

There is and one withdrawal.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews exist, and .

Workload

Light

72/100

Reviews give low difficulty ratings and do not describe heavy workload, but .

Format shift

but possible high independent learning demand.

Teaching experience

Average

50/100

One student praises his clarity and dedication, while another says he refuses questions and forces self-teaching.

Format shift

, and there are no online reviews.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

The comments focus on demonstrations and lab work rather than exams.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews mention lab-based learning, with no online evidence.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person evidence is sharply divided, with one student praising clear teaching and .

Main concern

Students may need to learn commands independently after demonstrations.

What students said

“His comprehensive teaching made the and enlightening.”
DRAFT140
“Prof refuses to answer questions”
DRAFT140

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format, .

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, proctoring, open-book rules, quizzes, midterms, or finals.

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Do yourself a favor, get a good book on Amazon and learn on your own.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting the sharp split in teaching quality and support. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

50/100

“Ben's dedication and .”

⚠️ Learning Support

35/100

“Prof refuses to answer questions”

👍 Recommendation Split

50/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • His comprehensive teaching made the and enlightening.
  • Lecture needs to be more interactive

Theme 2

🧰

  • then expects you to remember the commands in Lab.
  • the only way to learn AutoCAD is by doing

Theme 3

👍 About Recommendation

  • Ben's dedication and .
  • Do yourself a favor, get a good book on Amazon and learn on your own.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

35/100

Evidence confidence

, and they are highly polarized across a five-year gap.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

DRAFT1402 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1