AI Rate Professor

Physical Education

Gregory Aviles

PE266 · PE248 · WELL265 · 9 lifetime ratings

AI rating
26/100
RMP rating
2.7/5
Take again
33.33%
Difficulty
2.6

The decision

Take Gregory Aviles only if and inconsistent teaching, because the student experience varies widely.

Best fit · Self Taught ProUnclear InstructionsTough GraderMixed QualitySimple QuizzesGroup Projects
  • Reviews are sharply split, with some students calling him fun and easy while others describe poor teaching and .
  • Recent online reviews are negative and focus , and hidden grade breakdowns.
  • Some older , and an easy pass structure.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

Some versions are easy to pass with simple quizzes and assignments, but and .

Online evidence is negative and grading-focused, while in-person evidence includes both easy summer-course reports and .

Is the course easy?

Standard

54/100

The content can be simple in some PE courses, but and .

Online reviews do not describe content ease much, while course needing anatomy and biomechanics background.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

Reviews mention participation and no-shows but do not clearly prove a .

, while in-person reviews mention participation and group work without a .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

35/100

Recommendation is weak because many students complain about unclear instructions, tough grading, rude responses, or poor teaching effort.

Online reviews are strongly negative, while and strong warnings.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

Multiple reviews label him a tough grader or describe point deductions for .

Format shift

Online reviews focus on tough grading and hidden grade breakdowns, while complaints.

Workload

Moderate

52/100

Workload ranges from simple quizzes and , and confusing assignments.

Format shift

Online workload is not clearly described, while in-person workload varies from easy .

Teaching experience

Poor

32/100

Several students describe unclear instructions, poor lectures, rude clarification responses, and low teaching effort despite some positive older reviews.

Format shift

Online teaching evidence is negative, while but includes severe teaching-quality complaints.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Assessments include quizzes, , and a final reflection.

Format shift

Online reviews focus on grading visibility, while , and reflection-style finals.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

7 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

, and project-based to extremely negative comments about teaching quality and assignment clarity.

Main concern

The main concern is inconsistent instruction quality and .

What students said

“This professor and just expects you to know what to do.”
WELL265
“ and youll be fine.”
WELL265
“He put almost zero effort into the class.”
WELL265

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are negative and , and difficulty seeing final grade details.

Main concern

The main concern is poor communication and .

What students said

“Very rude when asked to clarify instructions.”
PE248
“there is no way to see the posted to gateway.”
PE248

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

because comments mention simple quizzes, a final reflection, one extremely difficult test, and later at-home tests, but .

Weekly QuizzesAt-Home TestsFinal ReflectionDifficult Test Mentioned

Assessment risk

Varies

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, one very difficult test, and later at-home tests, but do not clearly prove proctoring or open-book rules.

Weekly QuizzesFinal ReflectionAt-Home TestsDifficult Test Mentioned
“1-2 Quizzes every week that are found easily on Quizlet or within lecture powerpoints.”
PE266
“ .”
PE266
“then gave extremely a difficult test. Once. .”
WELL265

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, open-book rules, webcam rules, or .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“This professor and just expects you to know what to do.”

Voice snapshots generated from 9 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

32/100

“He put almost zero effort into the class.”

⚖️

28/100

“ .”

👍 Recommendation Rate

35/100

“ . ”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Very rude when asked to clarify instructions.
  • Should stick to coaching than trying to teach a class.
  • Professor Aviles made class fun with lots of group projects so you get to learn a lot from each other.

Theme 2

⚖️

  • there is no way to see the posted to gateway.
  • This professor and just expects you to know what to do.
  • and youll be fine.

Theme 3

📚 About Difficulty & Workload

  • Maybe in person, this class would be a lot harder, but online it's so easy to pass.
  • none of .
  • this class needs a pre requisite of anatomy and biomechanics.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

9

Recent reviews read by the AI

9

Lifetime ratings

72/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is medium because 9 reviews include specific details and both formats, but opinions are polarized and spread across many years.

Inside 9 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 53
1 out of 53

Course coverage

PE2483 reviews
PE2663 reviews
WELL2653 reviews

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

8 reported outcomes

A range

2

A+ 1 · A 1

B range

2

B 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

1

D- 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Not sure yet 3