AI Rate Professor

Computer Science

Robert Konefsky

CIS111 · 7 lifetime ratings

AI rating
64/100
RMP rating
3.7/5
Take again
62.5%
Difficulty
2.4

The decision

if and long lectures for a fair chance at a good grade.

Best fit · Effort For RewardHeavy HomeworkCaring InstructorLecture HeavyLenient DeadlinesMandatory Participation
  • Students often describe him as kind, passionate, and helpful.
  • The main drawback is a very heavy assignment load, especially in CIS111.
  • Grades can be good if students keep up, but falling behind is costly.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

68/100

An A is realistic because assignments are manageable and deadlines can be lenient, but the workload requires steady effort.

All evidence comes from in-person CIS111 reviews.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

63/100

The course is introductory and not conceptually hard for some students, but networking and the pace can feel demanding.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

20/100

Participation and as graded or expected.

.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

66/100

and helpfulness but hesitate because of and long lectures.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

72/100

Grades , and flexible due dates.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

24/100

Multiple students report lots of , and trouble keeping up.

Format shift

The heavy workload pattern is based only on in-person CIS111 reviews.

Teaching experience

Good

76/100

Students often call him caring, passionate, and helpful, though some dislike his long lecture style.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

18/100

Comments say , while the midterm and final are each only 4 percent.

Format shift

Assessment .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

8 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews show a , and mixed student tolerance for the workload.

Main concern

The workload can feel much heavier than the course difficulty suggests.

What students said

“He gave us like 14-19 assignments weekly”
CIS111
“The , but while”
CIS111
“professor konefsky is a super kind teacher”
CIS111

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews clearly support low exam weight, but do .

Low Exam WeightAssignment-Focused Grading

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

78/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews say the midterm and final are only a small part of the grade, with .

Low Exam Weight
“the midterm and final are only 4% of the grade each”
CIS111

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“The , but while, so falling behind is not a good time.”

Voice snapshots generated from 8 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

76/100

“He is a great instructor. He cares a lot about the students and .”

📚 Workload Reality

24/100

“I literally could not keep up with the work at all”

⚖️

72/100

“He is very lenient with due dates though as long as you ask.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He is passionate about teaching
  • professor konefsky is a super kind teacher
  • He cares a lot about the students and .

Theme 2

📚 About Workload

  • and
  • He gave us like 14-19 assignments weekly
  • The , but while

Theme 3

🎓 About Grades

  • As long as you do the work though, you should pass
  • Not hard, just do the homework.
  • getting an easy A at the cost of having to attend a 4 hour long lecture

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

8

Recent reviews read by the AI

7

Lifetime ratings

84/100

Evidence confidence

Eight detailed reviews across several years show consistent patterns about workload, teaching style, and grading.

Inside 8 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 54
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 50

Course coverage

CIS1118 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

8 reported outcomes

A range

5

A 5

B range

1

B 1

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1