AI Rate Professor

Ethnic Studies

Erika Santizo

ETHS101 · ETHS101F · 13 lifetime ratings

AI rating
24/100
RMP rating
2.1/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.9

The decision

if you want a manageable GE class, unless you can handle heavy self-teaching and lots of writing.

Best fit · Self Taught ProHeavy ReadingSo Many PapersDisorganized StructureHarsh GradingSelf Teaching
  • Students repeatedly describe the course as overloaded with reading, writing, and annotations for a 3-unit GE class.
  • Many reviews say instructions are vague, late, or .
  • High grades are possible, but the effort-to-reward ratio is widely seen as poor.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

42/100

Many students earned A grades, but they describe the A as , and tolerance for harsh or .

Both online and in-person reviews show high effort, with online and in-person reviews emphasizing volume.

Is the course easy?

Standard

42/100

The subject may not be conceptually impossible, but vague directions and .

Online reviews focus on reading and videos, while and .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do not clearly prove a , though some in-person reviews mention participation.

Neither online nor in-person comments clearly .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

18/100

Students mostly discourage taking her because the , and course structure is weak.

Both formats are negative, with and online reviews confirming the workload problem.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

Several reviews call her a tough or though many students still report A grades.

Format shift

Online , while in-person reviews combine tough grading with .

Workload

Overwhelming

12/100

Students repeatedly describe large amounts of reading, writing, annotations, videos, and papers for a 3-unit class.

Format shift

Both online and excessive.

Teaching experience

Poor

28/100

Students , but the dominant experience is disorganization, vague instructions, and self-teaching.

Format shift

, while online reviews focus more on workload and grading.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

15/100

Assessment is mainly reading, writing, reflections, annotations, papers, and .

Format shift

, and one in-person review says there were no exams or quizzes.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

11 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews , and inconsistent structure despite some care for students.

Main concern

Students feel overloaded and .

What students said

“Most students were lost.”
ETHS-101
“The .”
ETHS-101F

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

and writing with and poor effort-to-reward value.

Main concern

The online workload is too heavy for the course level.

What students said

“For an online course, we had to watch several hour-long videos to answer a few basic questions.”
ETHS-101
“For a 3-unit class, the amount of reading and writing required for this class is too much.”
ETHS-101F

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and mixed, with one review saying there were no exams or quizzes and another describing a .

No Exams or Quizzes MentionedMidterm Format ChangedPolicy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Varies

62/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews suggest little exam emphasis, but one review reports a .

No Exams or Quizzes MentionedMidterm Format Changed
“ .”
ETHS-101F
“For our midterm, she had us write AT LEAST 25 sentences in 45 min, then did something else for the ...”
ETHS-101

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove exam .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“The . And write more than you would write in your english classes.”

Voice snapshots generated from 13 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and recommendation risk. Credibility rating: High.

📚 Workload Pressure

12/100

“For a 3-unit class, the amount of reading and writing required for this class is too much.”

🎯 Teaching Quality

28/100

“She lacks structure.”

⚖️

28/100

“She is a .”

Theme 1

📚 About Reading and Writing

  • You constantly have to read and annotate to her criteria, if you don't she puts you on blast in front of everyone.
  • I'm writing and English class.
  • end of semester.

Theme 2

🧭 About Structure

  • Most students were lost.
  • She can be pretty vague with instruction and go on a random tangent thats barely even related to the course subject.
  • Directions are vague or changes them.

Theme 3

📈 About Grades and Effort

  • I got 98%in this class so I should be rating her higher. But the amount of work you have to put into this class is crazy.
  • Overall the class wasn't that bad whatsoever.I passed with a A+.
  • I usually always score an A, but in her class, it was difficult to get a B.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

13

Recent reviews read by the AI

13

Lifetime ratings

84/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 13 recent reviews across both formats repeat the , and organization concerns.

Inside 13 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 53
2 out of 54
1 out of 55

Course coverage

ETHS-101F8 reviews
ETHS-1015 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

13 reported outcomes

A range

10

A+ 3 · A 7

B range

2

B+ 1 · B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1