AI Rate Professor

Accounting

Ming-yin Scott

ACT101A · ACCT101AB · ACCT201B · 101A · 101B · ACCT101A · ACCT201AF · ACCT101BF · ACCT101AF · ACCT101 · ACCT101B · 53 lifetime ratings

AI rating
30/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
47.92%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

unless , and use study guides mainly to chase the grade.

Best fit · Self Taught ProHeavy homeworkSelf-teaching requiredStudy-guide examsGroup projectsPolarizing professor
  • Reviews are deeply split, with and newer reviews warning strongly against taking her.
  • The easiest route and memorizing study guides, not relying on lectures.
  • Online reviews are especially negative about self-teaching, Proctorio or , and group projects.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

Grades and study guides, but the , and inconsistent support make the A far from effortless.

path, while online reviews show heavier self-teaching and stricter exam controls.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

Accounting is already demanding, and many students say , Chegg, Cengage, or videos.

Online students report more self-study, while and confusing lectures.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

42/100

Attendance is not always clearly mandatory, but , and .

, while other reviews imply showing up and participation help the grade.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

34/100

Many students warn against her because of , and poor online support.

Online reviews are more consistently negative, while .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

32/100

Some study-guide exams and curves help, but many students cite , and .

Format shift

In-person reviews include more lenient study-guide patterns, while online reviews and proctoring.

Workload

Overwhelming

18/100

as long, tedious, weekly, and paired with group projects and .

Format shift

Both formats report lots of homework, with online reviews especially emphasizing tedious Cengage or McGraw Hill work.

Teaching experience

Poor

38/100

Students , though some older reviews call her knowledgeable and helpful.

Format shift

Online teaching is criticized as self-study, while and .

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

Grades commonly , and study-guide-based exams.

Format shift

Online reviews mention proctored exams and group projects, while and study-guide exams.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

35 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are mixed, with many older students saying exams match study guides and grades are attainable, but newer reviews describe poor teaching and .

Main concern

Lectures are often criticized as .

What students said

“She does not teach. AT. ALL.”
ACCT101A
“Only good thing is if you memorize the study guide you will get an A .”
ACCT101A
“She allows a single sided note card for the exam.”
ACCT101AF

Remote format

Online

15 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are mostly negative, with students describing , and weak support.

Main concern

Students often feel they must teach themselves while and .

What students said

“ .”
ACCT101BF
“You .”
ACCT101BF
“ and all from Cengage.”
ACCT101B

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam style varies by term but includes strict online proctoring and .

Lockdown BrowserProctorioClosed NotesStudy Guide Similar To ExamGroup Project

Assessment risk

Strict

35/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, with some note-card use, but other reviews describe hard or unrelated exams.

Study Guide Similar To ExamNote Card AllowedThree ExamsHard Tests
“Only good thing is if you memorize the study guide you will get an A .”
ACCT101A
“She allows a single sided note card for the exam.”
ACCT101AF
“ and have fill in the blank problems.”
ACCT101B

Online

Online reviews explicitly mention , and practice exams similar to tests.

Lockdown BrowserProctorioClosed NotesTwo Midterms And FinalPractice Exam Similar To Test
“ .”
ACCT101BF
“You .”
ACCT101BF
“ , but are easy with plenty of time if you studied the material beforehand.”
ACCT101AF

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Do yourself a favor and .”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: High.

📚 Workload Pressure

18/100

“A ton of .”

🎯 Teaching Quality

38/100

“ and all from Cengage.”

🧪

35/100

“ .”

Theme 1

📚 About Workload

  • of basic calculations that could be automated with software.
  • !
  • Get ready to spend a .
  • There are a lot of homework and .

Theme 2

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She does not teach. AT. ALL.
  • You pretty much have to study on your own with .
  • Very hard to understand and goes all over the place.
  • She gives you everything to pass the class.

Theme 3

🧪

  • .
  • The only good thing was that test.
  • and its the exact test.
  • She .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

53

Lifetime ratings

94/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 50 reviews across many years provide detailed, , and format differences.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 515
4 out of 512
3 out of 52
2 out of 57
1 out of 517

Course coverage

ACCT101A11 reviews
ACCT101AF7 reviews
ACCT1016 reviews
ACCT101B6 reviews
101A5 reviews
Show 6 more courses
101B4 reviews
ACCT101BF4 reviews
ACCT201B3 reviews
ACCT101AB2 reviews
ACCT201AF1 review
ACT101A1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

41 reported outcomes

A range

18

A+ 5 · A 12 · A- 1

B range

8

B+ 2 · B 4 · B- 2

C range

7

C+ 3 · C 2 · C- 2

D range

3

D 2 · D- 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

5

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 4