AI Rate Professor

Art

Bryan Johnson

DART132 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
1.7/5
Take again
33.33%
Difficulty
3.7

The decision

Avoid unless you can teach yourself, tolerate rigid rules, and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProRigid PoliciesHeavy WorkloadPoor TeachingBoring OnlineUnclear Rubrics
  • Students strongly criticize his teaching methods, rigidity, and .
  • , poor instruction, and strict process rules.
  • The one online review is less harsh about his character but still describes boring class time and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

A grades appear possible, but students describe heavy workload, rigid rules, and earn.

, while in-person evidence emphasizes excessive workload and rigid process rules.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

30/100

The course is not described as intellectually advanced, but , and time pressure make it difficult.

and workload, while the online review focuses on boredom and unclear rubrics.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

Students describe rigid attendance and staying late after class, suggesting low flexibility.

Attendance rigidity is supported by in-person evidence, while the online review .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

25/100

Students mostly advise against him because the workload, rigidity, and poor teaching outweigh his kindness or industry background.

, while the single online review is milder but still critical.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

, and unclear rubrics, though A grades show success is possible.

Format shift

In-person reviews stress rigid naming and process rules, while the online review stresses missing rubrics.

Workload

Heavy

22/100

Students repeatedly describe too much work, insufficient time, and extended class time for projects.

Format shift

Heavy workload appears in both formats, with in-person reviews sounding more severe.

Teaching experience

Awful

20/100

Students describe poor methods, rambling, outdated practices, and weak problem-solving despite one .

Format shift

, while the online review is personally positive but instructionally critical.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

15/100

Evidence centers on photo shoots, reference sheets, file naming, and assignments rather than exams.

Format shift

Both formats discuss assignments and critique work, with .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

, excessive workload, rigidity, and outdated practices.

Main concern

Students report too much work, strict minor rules, and weak technical guidance.

What students said

“He assigns way too much work with not enough time to get it done.”
DART132
“Poor teaching methods, rambles and often unsure of what to do or how to fix things.”
DART132
“ .”
DART132

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The online and experienced but the class is boring, critique-heavy, and .

Main concern

and online meetings feel inefficient.

What students said

“the online classes with him are SO boring.”
DART132
“The .”
DART132

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove exams, proctoring, .

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, open-book rules, quiz format, midterm format, or final format.

Online

The online review does not clearly prove exams, proctoring, .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ ”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

20/100

“Poor teaching methods, rambles and often unsure of what to do or how to fix things.”

📚 Workload Pressure

22/100

“He assigns way too much work with not enough time to get it done.”

⚖️

28/100

“The .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Unskilled and not up to date with .
  • Poor teaching methods, rambles and often unsure of what to do or how to fix things.
  • He's an industry pro and and helpful.

Theme 2

📈 About Workload and Rules

  • He assigns way too much work with not enough time to get it done.
  • Very rigid in
  • The .

Theme 3

💻 About Online Format

  • the online classes with him are SO boring.
  • I don't understand why we have to spend over an hour critiquing Ref Sheets every meeting.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

, but they are detailed and consistently critical across formats.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

DART1323 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values