AI Rate Professor

Psychology

Carlos Sandavol

FA273 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
24/100
RMP rating
1.8/5
Take again
25%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

unless you can handle poor communication and self-teaching.

Best fit · Self Taught ProUnresponsive OnlineOutdated MaterialsHeavy WritingDry LecturesFormat Split
  • Online students report old lectures, poor communication, essays, and .
  • The but old and outweighed by newer online complaints.
  • The main risk is low support, not just course difficulty.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

Grades are possible, but online students , and exam issues that raise the effort cost.

The easy-A evidence comes mostly from online complaints, while the .

Is the course easy?

Standard

42/100

The content does not sound conceptually extreme, but poor materials and access problems make the course harder to manage.

Online reviews describe avoidable difficulty from course design, while the .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

Reviews do not clearly prove a .

Neither online .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

25/100

Most recent online because he is unresponsive and unhelpful.

Online evidence is strongly negative, while the .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

30/100

Online students report exam access problems and heavy written work, with .

Format shift

Online reviews drive the strictness concern, while the .

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Students repeatedly mention lots of , and pop quizzes.

Format shift

Heavy workload evidence comes from online reviews; the .

Teaching experience

Poor

28/100

Recent online reviews describe dry lectures, old slides, and almost no help or communication.

Format shift

Online teaching is rated poorly, while the .

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Comments mention , and exams, so assessment appears mixed.

Format shift

Assessment evidence is from online reviews, with little in-person detail.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

The , but it is old and not enough to offset the online pattern.

Main concern

Evidence is too thin and dated for a strong in-person judgment.

What students said

“Professor Sandoval is a great lecturer who gives interesting ideas.”
FA273

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are strongly negative, , and exam access problems.

Main concern

Students may get little support when problems come up.

What students said

“Old lectures and .”
22525
“ to access yet.”
FA273

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam risk is high because online students report exams on unavailable chapters and .

Exams On Inaccessible ChaptersPop Quizzes

Assessment risk

Strict

30/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The .

Online

Online reviews mention pop quizzes and exams on chapters students could not access, but .

Exams On Inaccessible ChaptersPop Quizzes
“ to access yet.”
FA273
“Beware of pop quizzes”
22525

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Old lectures and .”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews, highlighting the contrast between recent online complaints and . Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

28/100

“Uses old powerpoints and does not help at all.”

👍 Recommendation Risk

25/100

“Never taking him ever again and .”

📚 Workload Pressure

25/100

“ ?”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Old lectures and .
  • . Dry

Theme 2

📈

  • ?
  • to access yet.

Theme 3

🏫 About Format Difference

  • Professor Sandoval is a great lecturer who gives interesting ideas.
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Four reviews show a clear recent online pattern, but the .

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 53

Course coverage

225252 reviews
FA2732 reviews

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

2

B+ 1 · B 1

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1