AI Rate Professor

Construction Technology

Jose Robledo

CSTR108 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
8/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
2.7

The decision

unless you can learn independently and tolerate minimal communication.

Best fit · Self Taught ProMonotone LecturesPoor CommunicationLow Student SupportLecture HeavyAvoid If Possible
  • Students consistently describe weak teaching, poor communication, and little support.
  • The course does not sound intellectually hard, but getting a strong grade is not clearly easy because .
  • All evidence is from in-person CSTR108 reviews, with no online data.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

Grades shown are Bs and students mention , so an A does not look easy even though the content may not be deep.

.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

62/100

The course seems lecture-based and not conceptually intense, but poor teaching makes it harder to follow.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do .

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

5/100

Students overwhelmingly advise avoiding him because of poor teaching, communication, and support.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

30/100

One review tags him as a , and as generous.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

Workload is not the main complaint; the main issue is poor teaching and communication.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Awful

10/100

Students describe monotone slide reading, poor communication, and little care for students.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

Reviews mention few graded items but as a major assessment method.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are strongly , and limited attention to students.

Main concern

Students say he gives little support and does not communicate well.

What students said

“he is not accessible outside of class he fails to do ”
CSTR108
“ .”
CSTR108
“spent maybe about 15% of the entire semester with the 2 unit class.”
CSTR108

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the .

Exam Policy Unclear

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

format, proctoring, or book policy.

Exam Policy Unclear

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ .”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews, highlighting consistent concerns in teaching and communication. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

10/100

“he fails to do .”

⚠️ Recommendation Risk

5/100

“ .”

📞 Communication

15/100

“there's almost no outside communication with him.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • he fails to do .
  • He's very monotone
  • Extremely lecture heavy

Theme 2

📞 About Support

  • he regularly disregards questions or comments
  • cares very little for people that are not going into his field

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

, but their complaints are highly consistent across several years.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 53

Course coverage

CSTR1083 reviews

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

2

B 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1