AI Rate Professor

Child Development

Romana Lopez

CDES210F · 210F · CDES210 · CDES120 · 16 lifetime ratings

AI rating
29/100
RMP rating
2.6/5
Take again
37.5%
Difficulty
3.4

The decision

if you can handle heavy writing, strict expectations, and a professor whose style many students find frustrating.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerHeavy writing loadTough graderDisorganized course flowDetailed feedbackPolarizing instructor
  • Reviews are highly polarized, but negative comments , and unclear expectations.
  • Students repeatedly report lots of reading, weekly papers, rewrites, and .
  • , and accessibility, especially when they communicate and follow directions closely.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

34/100

Some students earn A's, but the path often requires heavy reading, long papers, rewrites, careful compliance with directions, and tolerance for .

Online reviews make the A feel harder because of heavy weekly writing and strict grading, while and several workload complaints.

Is the course easy?

Standard

42/100

The subject can be interesting or even easy, but the , and writing make the experience feel harder.

Online reviews describe the course as harder due to workload and organization, while papers.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

Participation matters appears in several reviews, but the comments do not clearly prove a .

In-person reviews mention participation more directly, while online , and communication.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

35/100

Many students say because of heavy work, tough or , and poor explanation, despite some strong positive reviews.

Online recommendations are mostly negative or conditional, while and strong warnings.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

24/100

Students repeatedly call her a tough or and say .

Format shift

Online reviews strongly emphasize tough grading and rewrites, while and claims of subjective downgrading.

Workload

Overwhelming

14/100

The dominant pattern is lots of , and assignments due close together.

Format shift

Online reviews describe the workload as especially excessive, while and lots of reading.

Teaching experience

Poor

38/100

Some students praise her feedback and knowledge, but , and unclear expectations.

Format shift

Online reviews are more negative about organization and explanations, while and strong criticism.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

22/100

Assessment , and rewrites rather than clearly described exams.

Format shift

Both formats emphasize papers and course as test heavy.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

and engagement while others describe disorganization, heavy papers, and grading based on agreeing with her views.

Main concern

In-person concerns , and papers.

What students said

“Professor Lopez is an outstanding professor!”
CDES210F
“ and assignments are due random days of the week.”
CDES210

Remote format

Online

10 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Online reviews lean negative, repeatedly citing lots of , and poor organization, though some students praise her feedback.

Main concern

Online students most often complain , and confusing or late course management.

What students said

“The amount of and be .”
CDES210
“ . Romana is the worst! She is a mess.”
CDES210

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove a , and grade risk appears driven more by papers and assignments than documented exams.

Papers Drive GradesPossible Test Heavy CourseNo Clear Proctoring Evidence

Assessment risk

Varies

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, open-book rules, proctoring, midterm format, or , though one tag says test heavy.

PapersTest Heavy Tag
“Lot's of papers but they're pretty easy.”
CDES210
“ and assignments are due random days of the week.”
CDES210

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove webcam use, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, .

Weekly PapersAssignment-Based Grading
“After every lesson you are required to write a your grade.”
CDES120
“Weekly reflections.”
CDES210F

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“The amount of and be .”

Voice snapshots generated from 16 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

📚 Workload Load

14/100

“ .”

⚖️

24/100

“If its not her way its not right, had to re-write a lot of things because it wasnt her way.”

🎯 Teaching Quality

38/100

“ and a lot of her assignment format that she gave are wrong.”

Theme 1

📚 About Workload

  • Lots of , and lots of writing.
  • You write A LOT.
  • Always has so .
  • After every lesson you are required to write a your grade.

Theme 2

⚖️

  • but is willing to work with students to help them achieve good results.
  • She grades on only what she wants to hear from you, anything else is no
  • Quick to downgrade if her views are not submitted.

Theme 3

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She truly loves to teach and is an outstanding teacher.
  • , and she makes sure you really learn the material.
  • Unorganized and doesn't know how to use tech.
  • Shes rude and .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

16

Recent reviews read by the AI

16

Lifetime ratings

91/100

Evidence confidence

Sixteen reviews across formats and years provide detailed, consistent workload concerns with .

Inside 16 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 52
3 out of 50
2 out of 53
1 out of 57

Course coverage

CDES2107 reviews
CDES210F7 reviews
210F1 review
CDES1201 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

15 reported outcomes

A range

4

A+ 1 · A 1 · A- 2

B range

5

B+ 3 · B 2

C range

2

C 2

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

4

Not sure yet 3 · Rather not say 1