AI Rate Professor

Paralegal

Michael Moore

PLEG201 · PLEG105 · PLEG101 · 11 lifetime ratings

AI rating
77/100
RMP rating
3.9/5
Take again
72.73%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

if you want real legal training and , but expect steady work and a style that may not fit everyone.

Best fit · Effort For RewardDetailed feedbackLots of homeworkStrong legal instructionParticipation mattersMixed personality fit
  • Many students praise Moore as a strong and teaches practical legal skills.
  • The workload can be heavy, especially in higher-level or online courses, but effort often leads to strong grades.
  • A minority of students strongly dislike his tone, long lectures, participation expectations, and communication style.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

70/100

Most reported grades are A-range and helps, but students repeatedly say success , and putting in real effort.

In-person reviews show stronger easy-grade support through and open-note exams, while online reviews stress harder classes and more work.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

The concepts are manageable with notes and feedback, but , and long lectures make the course intellectually demanding.

Online reviews describe harder and heavier courses, while and and difficult.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

30/100

Participation and as important, and online tags warn that skipping class can hurt performance.

In-person evidence directly says participation and , while online evidence signals that skipping class is risky.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

73/100

Most students recommend him for strong teaching and feedback, but several reviews .

In-person reviews are more favorable overall, while online reviews are more polarized and .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

72/100

Grades are generally high and appears often, but effort, participation, and .

Format shift

and open-note exams, while online reviews emphasize hard work and valuable feedback more than grading leniency.

Workload

Heavy

32/100

Students frequently mention lots of , and major projects.

Format shift

Online reviews especially stress heavy work, while in-person workload .

Teaching experience

Good

78/100

Most , and career knowledge, but several criticize his tone, lectures, and communication.

Format shift

, while online feedback is split between excellent feedback and frustrating lecture or message style.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

35/100

Assessment appears driven mainly , and memos, with limited exam emphasis.

Format shift

and no exams in another, while online reviews focus more on assignments and final projects.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

8 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are mostly , and practical learning, though participation and lengthy assignments can matter.

Main concern

Some students find participation expectations, unclear assignments, or personality style frustrating.

What students said

“Great instructor, and I learned a lot in his class.”
pleg101
“There are not many assignments but they are .”
PLEG201

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Online reviews are polarized, with and learning value while one strongly criticizes long lectures and .

Main concern

Online students may face long lectures, lots of work, and a need to keep up closely.

What students said

“His classes are hard, but you will learn so much.”
PLEG201
“Long lectures, constant bi-daily messages with and unnecessary repetitiveness for remedial concepts.”
PLEG105

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

open-note and open-browser exams or assignment-based courses, though evidence varies by course.

Open Note ExamsOpen Browser ExamsFrequent QuizzesNo Exams In Some CoursesMajor Final Projects

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

82/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person evidence supports student-friendly assessment in some courses, including open-note and open-browser exams and at least one course with no exams.

Open Note ExamsOpen Browser ExamsNo ExamsFrequent Quizzes
“ and open browser.”
pleg101
“No exams, but and/or opinion letter, and a memo of law.”
PLEG105

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove proctoring, webcam use, Lockdown Browser, open-book rules, or .

Final Projects Worth Many Points
“The hardest projects are usually the .”
PLEG105

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“His classes are hard, but you will learn so much.”

Voice snapshots generated from 11 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and fit. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

78/100

“He actually teaches and gets to the .”

📚 Workload Reality

32/100

“Just be ready for a lot of work.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

73/100

“ !”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Great instructor, and I learned a lot in his class.
  • He actually teaches and gets to the .
  • He provides a lot of and responds to questions via email.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • You must put real effort in to pass.
  • As long as you pay attention and .
  • , though gives lots of homework but its to learn the topics more in depth so i understand.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Concerns

  • He tries too hard and participation matters.
  • Assignment instructions are unclear at times and he is not the .
  • Long lectures, constant bi-daily messages with and unnecessary repetitiveness for remedial concepts.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

11

Recent reviews read by the AI

11

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Eleven reviews across several years, courses, and formats provide detailed but somewhat polarized evidence.

Inside 11 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 56
4 out of 52
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

PLEG1057 reviews
pleg1012 reviews
PLEG2012 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

10 reported outcomes

A range

9

A+ 2 · A 6 · A- 1

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values