AI Rate Professor

Philosophy

Jason Sheley

PHIL160 · PHIL172 · PHIL170 · PHIL100 · CRTV160 · 13 lifetime ratings

AI rating
91/100
RMP rating
4.4/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
3.2

The decision

if you want a thoughtful , and genuine effort.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerKnowledgeable philosopherHelpful with writingAttendance mattersReading requiredStudent-friendly exams
  • Students usually describe Jason Sheley as knowledgeable, helpful, and good at making difficult philosophy or logic material usable.
  • The class , and attendance, but exams and due dates are often described as reasonable.
  • A few students found lectures or disliked his perspective, but the overall recommendation signal is very strong.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

68/100

An A is achievable with , and assigned work, but several students say they worked hard or needed to keep up.

because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

58/100

The subject can be conceptually tough, but he often breaks it down with structure, examples, and paper guidance.

All course and logic classes.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

45/100

as formally mandatory, but multiple students warn that skipping causes students to fall behind or fail.

.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

89/100

Students recommend him because he knows the material, cares about students, and makes difficult content useful.

The recommendation score because no online reviews exist.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

68/100

Grades appear fair because tests are straightforward or supported by notes, but , and .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

The workload is moderate, usually involving reading, tests, papers, notes, and .

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Excellent

88/100

Most students praise his knowledge, kindness, writing support, and .

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Assessment , and attendance-based participation.

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

13 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews describe a and reading but usually offer fair exams and strong support.

Main concern

Some lectures can be , and students who skip class or dislike structured reasoning may struggle.

What students said

“Dr. Sheley breaks down a complicated subject that is easier to understand with current analogies.”
PHIL172
“Expect to read and you'll be fine.”
PHIL160
“Make sure that you attend his courses or you will fall behind”
PHIL170

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam evidence suggests generally student-friendly tests, especially with notecards, open-book comments in one course, and some flexibility on dates.

3 x 5 notecard allowedOpen-book tests mentioned in one courseClass can choose exam datesStraightforward exams

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

82/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews mention a 3 x 5 notecard, earlier open-book tests in PHIL100, straightforward exams, and student input on exam dates.

3 x 5 notecard allowedOpen-book tests mentioned in one courseClass can choose exam datesStraightforward exams
“he only allowed 3x5 notecard front and back.”
PHIL170
“ and he helps you with the papers.”
PHIL100
“He allows the and .”
PHIL170

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Dr. Sheley breaks down a complicated subject that is easier to understand with current analogies.”

Voice snapshots generated from 13 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and exams. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

88/100

“Dr. Sheley breaks down a complicated subject that is easier to understand with current analogies.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

89/100

“If you want to grow as a writer and understand complicated material in !”

⚖️

68/100

“If you do what he asks you to do, you will get A.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • This Professor knows his stuff. Brillant Man. Get ready to learn.
  • He is always there to help his students and answer questions.
  • He is a good professor, he is really nice and teaches well.

Theme 2

📚 About Work And Attendance

  • Expect to read and you'll be fine.
  • Make sure that you attend his courses or you will fall behind
  • Pay attention to the lecture and and you'll pass.

Theme 3

📝 About Exams And Papers

  • 2 tests and 3 papers will decide your grade.
  • he will allow you to use a 3 x 5 index card.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

13

Recent reviews read by the AI

13

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 13 in-person reviews provide enough detail across multiple years, though there are no online reviews and some older comments.

Inside 13 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 59
4 out of 52
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

PHIL1726 reviews
PHIL1703 reviews
PHIL1002 reviews
CRTV1601 review
PHIL1601 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

11 reported outcomes

A range

5

A 5

B range

2

B+ 1 · B 1

C range

4

C 3 · C- 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values