AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Larsen Chris

MATH141 · MATH115A · MATH142 · MATH115 · MATH125 · 7 lifetime ratings

AI rating
67/100
RMP rating
3.7/5
Take again
71.43%
Difficulty
3.1

The decision

if you are willing to keep up with frequent work and want structured math support, but if you need a low-maintenance class.

Best fit · Effort For RewardHelpful when engagedClear math supportWorkload varies sharplyTest heavyAttendance matters
  • Positive reviews describe Larsen as , and helpful for students intimidated by math.
  • Negative reviews warn about heavy , and math lab expectations.
  • The online review is positive but , and dropped grades rather than a no-effort course.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

Good grades are reachable with , and lab effort, but the workload and .

Online evidence shows steady structured work with dropped grades, while and includes heavy-work complaints.

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

Students say she can make math understandable, but , and self-teaching complaints keep the course from feeling easy.

The single online review describes manageable section-based pacing, while difficult workload.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

35/100

Attendance and participation appear important because reviews warn that skipping class hurts performance and .

In-person reviews carry the , while the online review focuses on frequent .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

72/100

and clarity, but a serious minority warn against heavy workload and poor teaching structure.

Online evidence is positive, while and strong avoidance.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

Dropped quiz and , and , but tough-grader and test-heavy complaints limit grading leniency.

Format shift

Online reviews mention dropped grades, while and tough-grader complaints.

Workload

Heavy

32/100

Several reviews , and paid programs or workbooks.

Format shift

Online workload is steady and frequent, while and more negative.

Teaching experience

Good

70/100

, and helpful, but two in-person reviews describe self-teaching and lack of support.

Format shift

Online teaching evidence is positive, while .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

Reviews repeatedly mention , and homework as preparation.

Format shift

Both formats mention quizzes or strongly.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are split between strong praise for her support and , and self-teaching.

Main concern

Some students felt the workload and and that teaching support was insufficient.

What students said

“She makes math concepts easy to understand.”
MATH125
“students teach themselves online”
MATH115
“ ”
MATH142

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

The single online review describes an organized asynchronous class with , and dropped grades.

Main concern

Online work is steady, with .

What students said

“For an asynchronous class due dates were every few days for lecture packets and .”
MATH141
“ .”
MATH141

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessments appear frequent and test-centered, but reviews do not clearly prove proctoring, open-book rules, or closed-book rules.

Weekly TestsQuizzesDropped Lowest Test GradeExam Reviews

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and quizzes, but do not clearly prove proctoring or book policy.

Weekly TestsExam ReviewsQuizzes
“ ”
MATH115
“ and .”
MATH142
“Test heavy”
MATH142

Online

The online review mentions weekly quizzes and dropped quiz and but .

Weekly QuizzesDropped Lowest Test Grade
“ ”
MATH141
“ .”
MATH141

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If !”

Voice snapshots generated from 7 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

70/100

“She makes math concepts easy to understand.”

📚 Workload Reality

32/100

“ ”

👍 Recommendation Split

72/100

“Great professor. .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Professor Larsen is super sweet and will help you to succeed.
  • As long as you pay attention in class and do XYZ, she'll do her part in class to help you pass!
  • SHE DOESNT TEACH.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Work

  • For an asynchronous class due dates were every few days for lecture packets and .
  • Could've taken this course online.

Theme 3

🧪

  • and .
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

7

Recent reviews read by the AI

7

Lifetime ratings

76/100

Evidence confidence

Seven reviews across recent years give useful evidence, but opinions are polarized and the online sample has only one review.

Inside 7 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

MATH1423 reviews
MATH1151 review
MATH115A1 review
MATH1251 review
MATH1411 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

6 reported outcomes

A range

4

A+ 1 · A 3

B range

2

B+ 1 · B- 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values