AI Rate Professor

Biology

Michael Dejong

BIO100 · BIOL101 · BIOLB101 · BIO101 · 18 lifetime ratings

AI rating
37/100
RMP rating
2.9/5
Take again
33.33%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

if you can self-study biology heavily and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTest HeavyUnclear LecturesNice But ToughLenient CurveReading Required
  • Students often describe him as friendly and willing to help, but many say his lectures and .
  • Getting an A and test preparation, even though some older reviews mention curves or a lenient scale.
  • , while the single online review is more positive and says the work was manageable.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

34/100

An A is possible, but comments repeatedly say students must read, study hard, and survive difficult tests.

The online review reports an A with manageable work, but and .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

38/100

The biology content is not always advanced, but and .

Online evidence says the class itself was not hard, while and .

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

55/100

as not mandatory, but missing class can seriously hurt performance.

Attendance evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

36/100

Students like his personality, but too many reviews warn , and weak communication.

The only online review is positive, while the larger in-person set is highly mixed with .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

52/100

Some reviews mention curves, grade bumps, and an easier grading scale, but .

Format shift

Leniency evidence is mostly from in-person reviews, while the online .

Workload

Heavy

35/100

Students , and heavy study demands.

Format shift

The , and in-person reviews emphasize reading and test preparation.

Teaching experience

Poor

42/100

He is often described as nice and knowledgeable, but many students say and .

Format shift

, while in-person reviews are sharply divided and often negative.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

82/100

Reviews consistently emphasize tests, quizzes, and .

Format shift

Both formats mention quizzes or tests, but .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

17 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews are split between helpful and , and frustrating.

Main concern

Many students say and notes.

What students said

“Most of the time, half of the class will fail the tests”
BIOLB101
“ and , but he is a great professor.”
BIO101
“Horrible teacher. Can't teach, very unclear, tests have nothing to do with what he talks about.”
BIO101

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The single online review says the class was manageable but the .

Main concern

and material could be hard to grasp.

What students said

“The work is not difficult but the material can be hard to grasp.”
BIOL101
“The but are time consuming.”
BIOL101

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews describe difficult tests and quizzes, but they do not clearly prove open-book rules, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, or webcam requirements.

Test HeavyHard TestsWeekly QuizzesPrepU Homework

Assessment risk

Strict

34/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, but do not clearly prove closed-book rules or specific proctoring requirements.

Hard TestsTest HeavyPrepU-Based Questions
“Most of the time, half of the class will fail the tests”
BIOLB101
“The questions that will be on the test are taken directly from the .”
BIOL101
“Don't expect to pass the tests.”
BIO101

Online

The online review says quizzes were standard and based on previous lab work, with .

Standard Quizzes
“ in the .”
BIOL101

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Great guy, tough teacher.”

Voice snapshots generated from 18 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, exams, and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

42/100

“He is def passionate and knows his material but isn't so great at teaching it.”

⚖️

52/100

“ if needed. Thank goodness for the curve.”

🧪

34/100

“Horrible teacher. Can't teach, very unclear, tests have nothing to do with what he talks about.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Great guy, tough teacher.
  • .
  • He basically reads off PP all day and

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Read the text book in order to receive a good grade in his class or settle for a C.
  • You can easily get an A in his class.
  • Most of the time, half of the class will fail the tests

Theme 3

🧪 About Tests

  • if you read and study.
  • Don't expect to pass the tests.
  • The questions that will be on the test are taken directly from the .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

18

Recent reviews read by the AI

18

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 18 reviews span many years and show , and .

Inside 18 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 56
3 out of 52
2 out of 53
1 out of 54

Course coverage

BIO1018 reviews
BIOL1016 reviews
BIO1002 reviews
BIOLB1012 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

6 reported outcomes

A range

4

A 2 · A- 2

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1