AI Rate Professor

Chemistry

Fabian Botero

CHEM107 · CHEM100 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
31/100
RMP rating
2.9/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.8

The decision

Avoid unless you are comfortable teaching yourself and handling heavy written chemistry work.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerVague LecturesHeavy WorkloadTough Written ExamsDisorganizedKnowledgeable But Uneven
  • Students repeatedly say CHEM100 asks too much for an introductory course.
  • Written-response exams and .
  • A few students found him knowledgeable and helpful, but the overall tone is negative.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

34/100

Getting an A appears possible, but students describe lots of , and high effort for the grade.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Standard

44/100

The course content is introductory, but vague lectures and .

All course-difficulty evidence comes from in-person CHEM reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

Reviews do not clearly prove a , though one student describes strict classroom control.

Only in-person reviews mention classroom behavior, and .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

25/100

Most students warn against taking him because lectures are vague and the workload feels unreasonable.

The recommendation judgment .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

Students mention tough grading conditions through hard written exams, heavy expectations, and a .

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

22/100

Multiple reviews call out lots of work, many quizzes, research work, and heavy expectations for an introductory class.

Format shift

All workload evidence is from in-person reviews, with no online workload data.

Teaching experience

Poor

38/100

Students describe vague and unhelpful lectures, though a few say he is knowledgeable and helpful.

Format shift

In-person comments are mixed but lean negative; no online teaching evidence exists.

Assessment method

Balanced

62/100

Assessment appears , and other assignments.

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

, and demanding written exams, with only limited praise for his knowledge and helpfulness.

Main concern

Students feel the workload and course.

What students said

“His lectures are quite vague and, for an introductory level course, a lot of work is expected from the student.”
CHEM100
“We don't learn much, yet in turn he wants so much out of us.”
CHEM100
“But there was a ton of work, a ton of quizzes and .”
CHEM107

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are described as written-response and hard, while reviews .

Written-Response MidtermWritten-Response FinalHard ExamsMany Quizzes

Assessment risk

Strict

30/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews describe written-response midterms and , and many quizzes, but do not clearly prove book or .

Written-Response MidtermWritten-Response FinalHard ExamsMany Quizzes
“final and ..”
CHEM100
“he makes the tests be essay responses with 2 pages of response for 1 question”
CHEM100
“a ton of quizzes and ”
CHEM107

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ but.. His lectures are quite vague and, for an introductory level course, a lot of work is expected from the student.”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, workload, and exams. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

38/100

“His lectures are quite vague and, for an introductory level course, a lot of work is expected from the student.”

📚 Workload Pressure

22/100

“But there was a ton of work, a ton of quizzes and .”

⚖️

30/100

“final and ..”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • His lectures are quite vague and, for an introductory level course, a lot of work is expected from the student.
  • His lectures are just him talking, not alot of powerpoints or anything.
  • Professor Botero is a good professor and very knowledgeable, but .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • We don't learn much, yet in turn he wants so much out of us.
  • .
  • But there was a ton of work, a ton of quizzes and .

Theme 3

📝 About Exams

  • final and ..
  • he makes the tests be essay responses with 2 pages of response for 1 question
  • We ended up with about 25 quizzes by the end of the year.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

and are fairly consistent about workload and exams, but the sample is small and partly old.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 51
3 out of 52
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

CHEM1004 reviews
CHEM1071 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values