AI Rate Professor

LGBTQ Studies

Liz Sanchez

SOCSCI135 · SOSC130 · 9 lifetime ratings

AI rating
91/100
RMP rating
4.7/5
Take again
77.78%
Difficulty
2.8

The decision

if you want a meaningful, discussion-heavy class that , and engagement.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTransformational DiscussionsCaring ProfessorReading RequiredPerspective-ChallengingFair Grading
  • Students overwhelmingly praise Sanchez as passionate, caring, and intellectually transformative.
  • The class is manageable if students complete the readings and homework.
  • Some students may find the viewpoints intense, radical, or emotionally heavy.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

An A is realistic with , and participation, but students still describe meaningful effort and challenging material.

and required reading, while the one online review confirms a positive outcome but lacks grading detail.

Is the course easy?

Standard

56/100

The course is manageable but intellectually and emotionally challenging because readings, queer theory, and .

and active discussion, while the online review emphasizes transformation without describing difficulty mechanics.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

55/100

Participation and discussion matter, so , but reviews do not prove a .

In-person reviews mention participation and active discussion, while the online review .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

88/100

Most students recommend Sanchez because the class is caring, engaging, and perspective-changing despite some ideological intensity.

Both online and adding more nuance about who may not enjoy the class.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

74/100

Students call Sanchez a and report many A grades, but success and homework.

Format shift

, while the online review offers only a positive grade outcome.

Workload

Moderate

58/100

The , and participation, with several comments saying readings can be lengthy or challenging.

Format shift

, while the online review does not provide enough workload detail.

Teaching experience

Excellent

94/100

Students repeatedly describe Sanchez as , and deeply impactful.

Format shift

Both formats praise the teaching, with in-person reviews giving stronger evidence through repeated comments about lectures and discussion.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

, and participation more than exams.

Format shift

, and participation, while the online review does not describe assessment structure.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

8 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

, and fair grading, while noting heavy topics and reading.

Main concern

Students who dislike radical viewpoints or emotionally heavy topics may not enjoy the course.

What students said

“Lectures are very interesting as it is always an . Sanchez and the students (loved this).”
SOSC130
“ , but not too bad.”
SOSC130

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

The single online review is highly positive and describes the course as transformational and .

Main concern

Online evidence is limited to one review and does not describe workload or policies in detail.

What students said

“Truly transformational in and why we need to have space for these discussions and education.”
SOCSCI135

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, webcam use, .

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam FormatProjectsGroup ProjectsReadings

Assessment risk

Varies

60/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and projects, but do not clearly prove exam policy, open-book rules, midterms, finals, or proctoring.

ProjectsGroup ProjectsReadingsReviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Format
“The and are usually done as group projects, but they're willing to let you do them solo if you want to.”
SOSC130
“ , but not too bad.”
SOSC130

Online

The online review does not clearly prove exam policy, proctoring, .

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Format

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Prepare to get your mind blown!”

Voice snapshots generated from 9 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

94/100

“They teach through vulnerability, passion and care.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

88/100

“10/10 !”

📚 Reading Load

58/100

“ , but not too bad.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Lectures are very interesting as it is always an . Sanchez and the students (loved this).
  • They teach through vulnerability, passion and care.
  • They are one of and they love what they teach, you can tell!

Theme 2

📚

  • Overall, this class is smooth if you do the reading and homework.
  • , but not too bad.
  • Easy class if you do the HW but the .

Theme 3

❤️ About Impact

  • Professor Liz was an exceptional professor who challenged my ideologies for the better.
  • Truly transformational in and why we need to have space for these discussions and education.
  • I actually use the the things I learned in this class in everyday life.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

9

Recent reviews read by the AI

9

Lifetime ratings

91/100

Evidence confidence

Nine reviews across 2021 to 2024 are detailed and mostly consistent, with a and .

Inside 9 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 57
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

SOSC1308 reviews
SOCSCI1351 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

9 reported outcomes

A range

6

A+ 1 · A 5

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 2