AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Diem Nguyen

MATH141 · MATH120 · MATH120F · MATH015 · MATH100 · 11 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
2.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.6

The decision

unless you can learn math mostly on your own and only .

Best fit · Self Taught ProHard to UnderstandPoor Teaching ClarityHeavy HomeworkFrequent QuizzesExtra Credit Available
  • Many students say the language barrier and .
  • and , but they do not fix the teaching problems.
  • The only online review is strongly negative and says she relies on other people's videos.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

Getting a good grade seems possible through homework and , but students , and unclear teaching.

Online evidence shows a failing experience, while homework and .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

The math content is made harder by unclear explanations, a , and difficult tests.

The online review says instruction is nearly absent, while .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

, and needing to show up, even though strict attendance rules are not clearly stated.

Attendance evidence comes almost entirely from in-person reviews, with .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

15/100

because they find her hard to understand and ineffective at teaching.

The single online , and the in-person reviews are also mostly negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

48/100

and dropped quizzes help, but and difficulty earning strong grades.

Format shift

, while the online review gives no sign of grading leniency.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Students report lots of , and regular tests.

Format shift

Both formats include workload concerns, but the detailed workload .

Teaching experience

Awful

22/100

Students repeatedly say she is , and sometimes unhelpful.

Format shift

Online feedback says she does not teach, while and language barriers.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Grades appear , and .

Format shift

, and a project; online assessment details are not clear.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

10 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews repeatedly cite unclear lectures, a heavy accent, boring classes, quizzes, and and .

Main concern

The main concern is poor teaching clarity and limited help.

What students said

“She's hard to understand and she doesn't teach the subject matter very well”
MATH120
“Her English is not well and it seems that she doesn't care too much about her students.”
MATH120

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The online review is very negative and says she does not teach directly.

Main concern

The main concern is lack of direct instruction.

What students said

“horrible teacher she doesnt teach at all, uses other peoples videos to teach.”
MATH141

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention quizzes and tests, but they do not clearly prove open-book, proctoring, webcam, or .

Frequent QuizzesRegular TestsExtra Credit After Tests

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and difficult tests but do not clearly prove exam rules.

Frequent QuizzesDifficult Tests
“She has a .”
MATH120
“ , but the .”
MATH120F

Online

The online review does .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“This teacher is terrible. She's hard to understand and she doesn't teach the subject matter very well, at least not in any way that the class can comprehend.”

Voice snapshots generated from 11 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching clarity, workload, and . Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

22/100

“She's hard to understand and she doesn't teach the subject matter very well”

📚 Workload Pressure

28/100

“She either collects hw or has a quiz every class.”

👍 Recommendation Level

15/100

“ and I wish I would have taken the course with another instructor.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • horrible teacher she doesnt teach at all, uses other peoples videos to teach.
  • She's not the clearest teacher
  • This teacher is terrible.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • If you do all of the a good grade.
  • she gives a lot of .
  • , but the .

Theme 3

⚠️ About Student Concerns

  • Her English is really bad and her class is very boring.
  • No office hours so i couldnt get help
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

11

Recent reviews read by the AI

11

Lifetime ratings

67/100

Evidence confidence

There are 11 reviews with consistent complaints, but most are old and only .

Inside 11 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 53
2 out of 54
1 out of 53

Course coverage

MATH1206 reviews
MATH1412 reviews
MATH0151 review
MATH1001 review
MATH120F1 review

Reported outcomes

F results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values