AI Rate Professor

Film amp Television

Jayme Brown

CRTV227 · CRTV127 · 9 lifetime ratings

AI rating
41/100
RMP rating
2.9/5
Take again
55.56%
Difficulty
4.3

The decision

if you want a demanding screenwriting workshop and can handle harsh critique, heavy writing, and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough Screenwriting CoachHarsh GraderHeavy Writing LoadPolarizing FeedbackHigh Drop Risk
  • Jayme Brown is highly polarizing, with some students calling the course transformative and others calling it unprofessional or .
  • The course demands serious writing effort, thick skin, and openness to criticism rather than grade-focused thinking.
  • , and student withdrawals are major recurring risks.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

High grades are possible, but students , and a need for major effort and resilience.

Both formats show hard grading, with online reviews showing more withdrawal risk and in person reviews showing both harsh failure and successful recovery.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

The course is intellectually and creatively demanding because it expects serious screenwriting craft, extensive writing, critique, and revision.

Online reviews emphasize workload and vague expectations, while in person reviews emphasize a tough but craft-focused workshop.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

30/100

Participation matters and one online tag says skipping class means you will not pass, but .

Both formats include participation evidence, but neither clearly documents a .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

48/100

Recommendations depend heavily on whether the student values intense craft critique and poor experiences reported by others.

Online evidence is more negative overall, while in person evidence includes stronger praise from students who wanted rigorous craft training.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

20/100

Multiple reviews call her a tough , and grades tied to demanding writing standards.

Format shift

Online reviews emphasize tough grading and withdrawals, while in person and a student finishing with 97% after effort.

Workload

Heavy

24/100

Students describe many papers, , and a workload that caused withdrawals.

Format shift

Online reviews describe the heaviest workload pressure, while in person reviews still call the course hard and writing intensive.

Teaching experience

Poor

45/100

She , but reports of vague directions, unprofessional behavior, harshness, and weak scaffolding seriously lower the experience.

Format shift

Online reviews contain the strongest negative teaching evidence, while in person reviews are more split between excellent critique and awful organization.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

18/100

Assessment , and screenplay development rather than exams.

Format shift

Both formats focus on writing assignments and critique, with .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In person reviews say the class is tough and sometimes harsh, but can be deeply valuable for students committed to screenwriting.

Main concern

The course is difficult, tightly run, and risky for students who need gentle instruction or .

What students said

“This class will be hard but keep going even when it's hard.”
CRTV127
“The class is tough and she does run a tight ship.”
CRTV127
“ENTIRE class failed first assignment.”
CRTV127

Remote format

Online

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Online reviews are sharply and severe complaints about professionalism, vague directions, grading, and withdrawals.

Main concern

Students report heavy work, harsh or , and serious negative classroom experiences.

What students said

“TAKE THIS COURSE and PUT IN WORK!”
CRTV227
“ .”
CRTV127
“I had to withdraw from this course.”
CRTV127

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews center on writing assignments and critiques, and do not clearly prove exam .

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam PolicyWriting AssignmentsScreenplay Projects

Assessment risk

Varies

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In person reviews discuss assignments, critiques, and course rigor but .

Writing AssignmentsCritiquesReviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy
“Her critiques, .”
CRTV127
“ENTIRE class failed first assignment.”
CRTV127

Online

Online reviews mention writing assignments and feedback timing but do not clearly prove webcam, .

Writing AssignmentsReviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy
“ back”
CRTV127
“Class teaches basics of screenwriting for feature film”
CRTV227

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you genuinely want to become a .”

Voice snapshots generated from 9 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and polarized recommendations; credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

45/100

“Her critiques, .”

⚖️

20/100

“ENTIRE class failed first assignment.”

📚 Workload Demand

24/100

“TAKE THIS COURSE and PUT IN WORK!”

Theme 1

✍️ About Writing Growth

  • You will learn so much about the film industry and your own person.
  • I learned so much and I .
  • My current screenplay would not be at the current state it is in.

Theme 2

⚠️ And Workload

  • ENTIRE class failed first assignment.
  • She gives very vague directions for assignments and expects perfection out of it.
  • Next assignment due before you get the last one back so .

Theme 3

🚦 About Recommendation Fit

  • If you genuinely want to become a .
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

9

Recent reviews read by the AI

9

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

The analysis uses 9 detailed reviews across both formats, but opinions are highly polarized and the review count is modest.

Inside 9 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 54

Course coverage

CRTV1277 reviews
CRTV2272 reviews

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

9 reported outcomes

A range

4

A 4

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

5

Drop/Withdrawal 3 · Incomplete 1 · Rather not say 1