AI Rate Professor

Political Science

Charolette Samuels

POSC101 · CN21900 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
35/100
RMP rating
2.5/5
Take again
25%
Difficulty
2.8

The decision

Only consider her if you can handle a polarizing, participation-heavy class and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProParticipation mattersLecture heavyPolarizing humorSyllabus concernsMixed format experience
  • The single online review is very positive and praises lectures, humor, and professionalism.
  • In-person reviews are mostly negative, citing cancellations, inappropriate comments, and uncomfortable class discussion tactics.
  • Participation appears important, and the course experience depends heavily on tolerance for her discussion style.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

54/100

Grades do not look impossible, but participation matters and .

Online evidence is positive but limited, while and class fit matter more.

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

Difficulty ratings are moderate, but participation-heavy lectures and classroom dynamics can make the course feel harder.

The online review found lectures memorable, while .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

One in-person tag explicitly says skipping class means you will not pass, and participation is repeatedly noted.

Attendance concern comes from in-person reviews, while the online review .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

35/100

The online student recommends her, but because of conduct, syllabus, and discussion concerns.

Online evidence is favorable, while .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

50/100

Reviews do , but participation seems important to performance.

Format shift

The only clear grading evidence .

Workload

Moderate

58/100

Workload is not described as heavy, but participation and .

Format shift

Neither format gives strong workload detail.

Teaching experience

Poor

38/100

One online student praises her lectures, but , and uncomfortable classroom behavior.

Format shift

Online teaching feedback is positive, while .

Assessment method

Balanced

52/100

Reviews suggest participation and lectures matter, but they do not clearly define the full assessment mix.

Format shift

Both formats lack detailed breakdowns of assignments versus exams.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are mostly negative and , and lecture-heavy participation demands.

Main concern

The main concern is classroom conduct and inconsistent course management.

What students said

“She would cancel class several times, make inappropriate jokes, doesn't follow the syllabus”
POSC101
“singling out a student with a different opinion to spark class conversations is a useful technique”
POSC101
“Skip class? You won't pass.”
POSC101

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

The online or hybrid review is strongly positive and praises memorable lectures and humor.

Main concern

The main concern is low confidence because there is only one online review.

What students said

“The professor's professionalism and humor make a great combination for memorable lectures”
CN21900

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, open-book status, midterm rules, or .

Exam Policy Unclear

Assessment risk

Varies

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, proctoring, open-book status, or quiz format.

Online

The online review does not clearly .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She would cancel class several times, make inappropriate jokes, doesn't follow the syllabus, and she will try to convince you what you believe is wrong.”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews, separating online praise from in-person concerns about class climate and course management. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

38/100

“She would cancel class several times, make inappropriate jokes, doesn't follow the syllabus”

💬 Class Climate

35/100

“I don't think singling out a student with a different opinion to spark class conversations is a .”

👍 Online Experience

65/100

“The professor's professionalism and humor make a great combination for memorable lectures”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • doesn't follow the syllabus
  • Lecture heavy
  • memorable lectures

Theme 2

💬 About Participation

  • Participation matters
  • Skip class? You won't pass.
  • singling out a student with a different opinion

Theme 3

⚖️ About Fit

  • Not for r a d i c a l s
  • she will try to convince you what you believe is wrong.
  • I found it a pleasure to be in professor Samuels's POSC 100 hybrid class

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

38/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is low because there are only 4 reviews, with one online positive review conflicting with .

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 51

Course coverage

POSC1013 reviews
CN219001 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B 1

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values