AI Rate Professor

Engineering

David Antimie

CSTR100F · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
68/100
RMP rating
5.0/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

if you want a caring instructor with real industry experience and and homework.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerCaringIndustry ProfessionalHeavy ReadingHomework DrivenLecture Integration
  • The single review strongly praises Antimie as caring and professionally experienced.
  • The course appears demanding because it includes lots of book reading and homework.
  • The , and tests, so effort seems meaningful rather than random.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

42/100

The reported B+ and and .

Evidence .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

The course seems intellectually demanding because students must connect lots of reading and , and tests.

Evidence .

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

55/100

, but the review says lectures help the workload come together.

The , while no online evidence exists.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

88/100

The student gives a perfect quality rating and says the class is awesome because Antimie cares and has industry experience.

Recommendation evidence .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

45/100

The B+ outcome and , but there is no harsh-grading complaint.

Format shift

No online grading evidence exists, and the .

Workload

Heavy

25/100

The review explicitly says there is lots of book reading and homework.

Format shift

Workload evidence .

Teaching experience

Excellent

90/100

The student says Antimie cares, brings industry experience, and ties the workload into lectures, quizzes, and tests.

Format shift

Teaching evidence .

Assessment method

Balanced

60/100

The course uses homework, quizzes, and tests, so assessment appears balanced with a .

Format shift

Assessment evidence .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

The as caring and professional but and homework.

Main concern

The main concern is and homework.

What students said

“Awesome class really cares and industry professional.”
CSTR100F
“Lot's of book reading and homework but it all comes together in and test.”
CSTR100F

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention quizzes and tests but do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, open-book rules, or .

QuizzesTestsReviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The and tests but does not clearly prove exam rules or proctoring.

QuizzesTestsReviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy
“Lot's of book reading and homework but it all comes together in and test.”
CSTR100F

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Lot's of book reading and homework but it all comes together in and test.”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 review, highlighting key themes in teaching quality and workload. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

90/100

“Awesome class really cares and industry professional.”

📚 Workload Reality

25/100

“Lot's of book reading and homework but it all comes together in and test.”

👍 Recommendation Signal

88/100

“Awesome class really cares and industry professional.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Awesome class really cares and industry professional.
  • it all comes together in and test.

Theme 2

📚 About Workload

  • Lot's of book reading and homework

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

32/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is low because there is only one review, though it gives useful detail about workload and assessment.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

CSTR100F1 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values