AI Rate Professor

Horticulture

Kent Gordon

LNDS101 · HORTCAD · HORT165 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
74/100
RMP rating
3.9/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
2.3

The decision

Gordon looks like a good instructor from limited evidence, but the small review set leaves real uncertainty.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyClear ExplanationsHelpful InstructorQuiz PreparationMixed Accessibility Concern
  • Most reviews describe Gordon as , and good at explaining expectations.
  • The grade path appears easy in positive reviews, but the sample is very small and old.
  • One serious negative review reports poor accommodation support, overtime classes, and excessive expectations.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

The and difficulty evidence suggest an easy A path, but the small sample and one failure complaint limit confidence.

because there are zero online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

and advance quiz guidance, though one review says expectations were too high.

Only in-person evidence exists, so .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

Reviews , but one student says he kept class overtime.

, and there are no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

76/100

Most available comments are positive, but the tiny review count and one strong negative review prevent a .

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

74/100

Low difficulty ratings and an A+ report suggest lenient outcomes, but one student says .

Format shift

reviews.

Workload

Light

72/100

Most reviews suggest manageable difficulty, though one review describes expectations as too high.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Good

76/100

Positive comments praise his clarity and helpfulness, but one detailed negative review raises a serious support concern.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

The clearest assessment evidence mentions quizzes and .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

All evidence is in person, with three positive or high-rated reviews and one serious negative complaint.

Main concern

The main concern is one report of poor DSS cooperation and excessive expectations.

What students said

“This guy was great.”
HORT165
“ and always takes time to answer questions.”
HORT165
“STAY AWAY!”
LNDS101

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention quizzes and tests with advance expectations, but they do not clearly prove open-book, closed-book, proctoring, midterm, or .

QuizzesTestsReviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy

Assessment risk

Standard

62/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and tests, but do not clearly prove exam rules, proctoring, open-book status, midterm format, or .

QuizzesTestsAdvance Expectations
“He also lets you know in advance exactly what and tests.”
HORT165
“Wouldn't give them the so .”
LNDS101

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ and always takes time to answer questions.”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, assessment, and support concerns. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

76/100

“ and always takes time to answer questions.”

👍 Recommendation Signal

76/100

“This guy was great.”

⚠️ Support Concern

38/100

“Refused to cooperate with DSS.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • This guy was great.
  • Kent is a great instructor.
  • and always takes time to answer questions.

Theme 2

🧪

  • He also lets you know in advance exactly what and tests.
  • Wouldn't give them the so .

Theme 3

⚠️ About Student Support

  • Refused to cooperate with DSS.
  • He didn't care.
  • Kept us overtime so I was late for next class.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

38/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is low because only 4 reviews are available, several are old or vague, and one review says No Comments.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

HORT1652 reviews
HORTCAD1 review
LNDS1011 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A+ 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values