AI Rate Professor

Child Development

Pamela Keller

CDES261 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
88/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
80%
Difficulty
2.2

The decision

if you want a caring professor and can keep up with fieldwork, papers, and weekly tasks.

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaring professorClear modulesEasy A onlineWriting heavyFieldwork required
  • Online students describe Keller as , and supportive.
  • The course can be an easy A online, but , and participation notes.
  • The delays, writing volume, and finals.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

82/100

Online students call it an easy A when work is completed, but fieldwork, papers, quizzes, and the .

Online evidence strongly supports an easy A, while the only in-person review suggests a much harder writing-heavy experience.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

The course is organized and manageable online, but fieldwork and and effort.

Online sections sound clear and manageable, while the and frustrating.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

62/100

, but participation notes, Zoom opportunities, and fieldwork still require engagement.

Online reviews mention optional lectures and Zoom access, while the .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

82/100

Most students recommend Keller for being sweet, caring, and supportive, though and finals concerns.

Online students recommend her strongly, while the .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

76/100

Online reviews mention easy grading, full credit for late work during the pandemic, and , but the .

Format shift

, while the single in-person review reports tougher and .

Workload

Moderate

58/100

The work is manageable but includes fieldwork, weekly , and a portfolio.

Format shift

Online reviews call the tasks easy but numerous, while the .

Teaching experience

Good

82/100

Students mostly describe Keller as caring, kind, organized, and .

Format shift

, while the in-person evidence is emotionally positive but operationally critical.

Assessment method

Balanced

52/100

Assessment mixes fieldwork, papers, quizzes, discussion posts, portfolio work, and a and multiple-choice parts.

Format shift

Online evidence shows a broad mix of assignments and quizzes, while and exams.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

The but criticizes delayed grading, heavy writing, and frustrating finals.

Main concern

, and .

What students said

“I can't and she still never graded them.”
CDES261
“She's caring but .”
CDES261

Remote format

Online

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews are positive, with , and an easy A for students who complete the work.

Main concern

The course , and participation notes.

What students said

“ and organized.”
CDES261
“Extremely easy A and pretty good professor!”
CDES261
“Our grade is really reliant on our 45 hours of fieldwork in a public elementary school.”
CDES261

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews describe standard quizzes and a final with written and multiple-choice parts, with .

Weekly QuizzesFinal Half Written Half Multiple ChoicePapers and Exams

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The and exams but does not clearly prove proctoring or open-book policy.

Papers and Exams
“ and then exams.”
CDES261

Online

Online reviews mention Monday quizzes and a final split between written and multiple-choice questions, but .

Weekly QuizzesFinal Half Written Half Multiple Choice
“ .”
CDES261
“The and half multiple choice.”
CDES261

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Professor Keller is THE BEST! So sweet, kind, and supportive.”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

82/100

“Pamela is so sweet and .”

📈 Easy A Potential

82/100

“This class was fun and an easy A!”

⚖️ Workload Reality

58/100

“There are quite a . So be prepared.”

Theme 1

❤️ About Support

  • She wants everyone to be successful.
  • Very caring professor.
  • So sweet, kind, and supportive.

Theme 2

📚 About Workload

  • Our grade is really reliant on our 45 hours of fieldwork in a public elementary school.
  • Weekly assignments but they are pretty easy, as well as the quizzes.
  • I hate writing and I feel like that's all we have done in this class personally.

Theme 3

🧪 About Exams and Grading

  • The and half multiple choice.
  • She was lenient with our work bc of the pandemic so she allowed late work and gave full credit.
  • I can't and she still never graded them.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

The rating has moderate credibility because there are only 5 reviews, but they are recent and fairly detailed.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 51
3 out of 52
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

CDES2615 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

3

A+ 3

B range

2

B+ 1 · B- 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values