AI Rate Professor

Chemistry

Michael Skinner

CHEM111A · CHEM107 · CHEM101 · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
5/100
RMP rating
1.2/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
4.7

The decision

unless you can , and unclear direction.

Best fit · Self Taught ProTough graderHeavy homeworkConfusing lecturesPop quizzesPoor communication
  • Students overwhelmingly warn against taking him because the class feels harsh and confusing.
  • , and as excessive or unfair.
  • Several students .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

10/100

Even passing appears costly because reviews mention , and self-teaching.

Both formats are negative, with and in-person emphasizing harsh grading and pop quizzes.

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

12/100

The course feels very difficult because students say , and material often must be self-taught.

Online reviews describe difficult work before instruction, while and unsupported quizzes.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

20/100

, but one tag says skipping class will prevent passing and the course appears lecture-dependent.

, while online reviews do not clearly prove an attendance policy.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

5/100

Students consistently say not to take him because of , and .

Both online and .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

5/100

Reviews repeatedly call him a and , and disputed lab report grading.

Format shift

, while online reviews also tag him as tough.

Workload

Overwhelming

5/100

Nearly every review mentions lots of homework, difficult assignments, or work assigned before instruction.

Format shift

Heavy workload appears in both formats, with online students stressing confusing assignments and .

Teaching experience

Awful

12/100

Students describe him as , and likely to make students self-teach.

Format shift

Both formats criticize teaching quality, with .

Assessment method

Balanced

62/100

The class appears to rely on homework, quizzes, exams, lab reports, and .

Format shift

Online reviews emphasize assignments, while reports, and reading.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews describe strict grading, , and poor communication.

Main concern

Students report , and yet taught.

What students said

“This professor is extremely strict with work yet has poor communication skills whenever it comes to directions.”
CHEM107
“ ”
CHEM107
“He is so confusing and honestly did not understand what he was trying to say most of the class”
CHEM101

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are extremely negative, citing boring teaching, difficult , and withdrawal-level frustration.

Main concern

Students felt they had to .

What students said

“ and they were extremely difficult to understand.”
CHEM107
“ ”
CHEM107

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

, and , but do not clearly prove proctoring, webcam, open-book, or closed-book rules.

Pop QuizzesStrict GradingWrong Answer Key

Assessment risk

Strict

25/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and , but not proctoring or book policy.

Pop QuizzesStrict GradingWrong Answer Key
“Beware of pop quizzes”
CHEM107
“The first exam's was wrong”
CHEM111A
“ ”
CHEM107

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, webcam, open-book, midterm, or .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I am .”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and recommendation. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

12/100

“He is so confusing and honestly did not understand what he was trying to say most of the class”

📚 Workload Pressure

5/100

“he and gave us quizzes on material we haven't even discussed”

⚖️

5/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He was an incredibly boring professor.
  • He teaches as if you already understand the general idea of the lessons and simply skims through most of the lessons.
  • I had to learn most of the material on YouTube.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • This professor is extremely strict with work yet has poor communication skills whenever it comes to directions.
  • .
  • He took many points off my lab reports for sig figs which were correct

Theme 3

🚫 About Recommendation

  • unless you want to have a hard time.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Six reviews over several years are highly consistent, detailed, and overwhelmingly negative.

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 55

Course coverage

CHEM1074 reviews
CHEM1011 review
CHEM111A1 review

Reported outcomes

C range results lead the reported letter grades.

6 reported outcomes

A range

1

A+ 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

3

C 1 · C- 2

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Drop/Withdrawal 2