AI Rate Professor

Engineering

Mareike Claasen

MATH252 · ENGR201 · ENGR110 · MATH142 · 8 lifetime ratings

AI rating
47/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
42.86%
Difficulty
3.6

The decision

if , and a demanding style that some students appreciate but others strongly reject.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerHeavy homeworkTough graderMixed teaching styleTest heavyHelpful if you work
  • Student experiences are sharply mixed, ranging from brilliant and .
  • The , and strict expectations about methods.
  • Students who learn independently and keep up with , but many find the workload stressful.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

40/100

An A is possible, but only with , and acceptance of .

Online and exams, while in-person evidence is mixed but still ties good .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

The material and structure feel challenging because reviews , and limited examples.

Online evidence is harsher about notes and exams, while but doable to fair and preparatory.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

because reviews and tags say skipping class hurts success and participation matters.

Attendance evidence comes from in-person reviews and tags, while .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

43/100

Recommendation depends heavily on whether the student , and a flipped or definition-heavy teaching style.

The only online review is strongly negative, while and strong avoidance.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

35/100

as fair by supporters but strict or method-dependent by critics.

Format shift

Online evidence calls the grading technique-dependent and harsh, while and tough-grader complaints.

Workload

Heavy

20/100

and formats.

Format shift

Both formats mention lots of as severe and in-person calling it stressful but sometimes doable.

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

Teaching quality is polarized, with some students praising preparation and care while others call the notes, videos, or course focus ineffective.

Format shift

Online evidence is poor, while and includes both excellent and .

Assessment method

Balanced

68/100

Assessment , and finals, with tests still carrying major stress.

Format shift

Online evidence emphasizes homework and tough exams, while , and finals.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

7 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews are mixed, with some praising fairness and preparation while , and pass risk.

Main concern

and strict grading can make the course stressful even for strong students.

What students said

“Lots of . Stressful but doable.”
ENGR201
“if she doesn't like or agree with how you did it, ”
ENGR201
“Easy A if you do and understand all of the .”
ENGR110

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The online review is very negative, citing poor teaching, excessive homework, tough exams, strict technique expectations, and useless notes.

Main concern

The workload and .

What students said

“ALOT OF time to actually study the material”
MATH252
“ and she requires a certain technique or else u cheated”
MATH252

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

, and a final, but do not clearly prove open-book, closed-book, webcam, proctoring, or Lockdown Browser rules.

Tough ExamsTest HeavyPop QuizzesFinal Exam Mentioned

Assessment risk

Strict

32/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

structure, and a final, but not proctoring or book policy.

Fair ExamsPop QuizzesTest HeavyFinal Exam Mentioned
“fair exams.”
ENGR110
“BEWARE OF POP QUIZZES”
MATH142
“making it to the final and somehow not doing well on it”
ENGR201

Online

The but does not clearly prove proctoring, webcam, open-book, midterm, or .

Tough Exams
“ ”
MATH252

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Lots of . Stressful but doable.”

Voice snapshots generated from 8 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and recommendation. Credibility rating: High.

📚 Workload Pressure

20/100

“Lots of . Stressful but doable.”

⚖️

35/100

“if she doesn't like or agree with how you did it, ”

🎯 Teaching Quality

55/100

“Very reasonable, respected our time and tried to make sure we understand.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Flipped classroom so lectures were videos online and class was working on problems and .
  • She's not my style of teaching (definition intensive and only goes over one example) but I still really liked her.
  • her notes are useless

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Easy A if you do and understand all of the .
  • Lots of . Stressful but doable.
  • she requires a certain technique or else u cheated

Theme 3

👍 About Recommendation

  • if you want to pass.
  • Wish I could have her for engineering now.
  • AVOID.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

8

Recent reviews read by the AI

8

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Eight reviews span many years and provide detailed, but highly mixed, evidence across courses and formats.

Inside 8 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 53
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 52

Course coverage

ENGR1103 reviews
ENGR2013 reviews
MATH1421 review
MATH2521 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

2

A+ 1 · A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1