AI Rate Professor

Nutrition

Michelle Loy

FOOD60 · NUTR210 · NUTR210HF · NUTRITION120 · 16 lifetime ratings

AI rating
94/100
RMP rating
4.7/5
Take again
85.71%
Difficulty
2.2

The decision

if you want a supportive professor and an easy-to-manage nutrition course with meaningful but .

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaring and accessibleWell structured courseUseful nutrition contentEasy A with effortAssignment heavy online
  • Students consistently praise Loy as , and helpful.
  • The course content is generally easy and practical, but online sections can require steady weekly work.
  • Grades are usually strong, though some students warn that projects and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

86/100

Most students earned A grades and call it an easy A, but online work and .

Online evidence points to more weekly work and , while attendance and homework.

Is the course easy?

Introductory

84/100

Students repeatedly say the nutrition content is easy, practical, and and projects.

Both formats describe approachable content, but and assignments.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

65/100

and sometimes tied to in-class points, but the reviews do not show a .

In-person reviews mention showing up for points and success, while online .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

91/100

Students strongly recommend her because , and .

Both formats are positive, with online praise focused on structure and feedback and and personal support.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

72/100

Grades are mostly high and appears, but a few online reviews call her a and projects.

Format shift

Online grading is described as more exacting, while effort.

Workload

Moderate

56/100

The workload is steady rather than light, especially online , and projects are common.

Format shift

Online reviews emphasize lots of homework, while and more activity based.

Teaching experience

Excellent

94/100

Students consistently describe Loy as , and .

Format shift

Online students praise structure and feedback, while in-person students praise lectures, accessibility, and enthusiasm.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

Assessment appears driven , and some tests depending on section.

Format shift

Online sections lean heavily on assignments and projects, while and some tests.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

7 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person reviews , and very manageable grading when students attend and keep up.

Main concern

Some tests cover broad information and .

What students said

“Very easy class as long as you show up, all of the .”
NUTR210
“It's a pretty easy A if you go to class, study barley and do all the homework.”
NUTR210

Remote format

Online

9 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews praise the and , but mention weekly assignments and some strict grading.

Main concern

, and projects can add up.

What students said

“ .”
NUTR210HF
“There was a lot of homework, but I learned a .”
NUTR210

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

because several sections use projects or straightforward tests, though policies vary by format and term.

Projects Instead Of Midterm And FinalStudy Sheet AllowedStraightforward Tests

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

82/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and a cumulative final, with study sheets allowed in one course, but do not clearly prove closed-book rules.

Study Sheet AllowedStraightforward TestsCumulative Final
“she allows a study sheet for one of the ”
NUTR210
“ , but they cover a broad range of info”
NUTRITION120

Online

and final work in some sections, but do not clearly prove proctoring, webcam, Lockdown Browser, or open-book rules.

Projects Instead Of Midterm And FinalNo Clear Proctoring Evidence
“The and they make up 45% of your grade”
NUTR210HF
“ , but a .”
NUTR210HF

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ if you want a .”

Voice snapshots generated from 16 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

94/100

“Loved professor Loy. , and engaging.”

📚 Workload Reality

56/100

“There was a lot of homework, but I learned a .”

📈 Grade Outlook

86/100

“such an easy A if you just put in effort.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She's the .
  • and .
  • She genuinely cares about her students & her lectures are made more interesting because of how much she loves what she does.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Pretty chill class.
  • Super easy
  • It's a pretty easy A if you go to class, study barley and do all the homework.

Theme 3

📝 About Workload

  • Assignment heavy, as you usually have a discussion and activity each week, but the actual content is easy.
  • She is an excellent instructor but .
  • Only the .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

16

Recent reviews read by the AI

16

Lifetime ratings

92/100

Evidence confidence

Sixteen detailed reviews across many years and both formats show a consistent pattern of strong teaching with moderate workload concerns.

Inside 16 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 513
4 out of 52
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

NUTR21011 reviews
NUTR210HF3 reviews
FOOD601 review
NUTRITION1201 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

15 reported outcomes

A range

12

A+ 1 · A 11

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 2