AI Rate Professor

English

Nina Calabretta

ENGL103 · ENG100 · ENGL100 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
100/100
RMP rating
4.8/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
2.4

The decision

if you want a and makes success very reachable.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyCaring writing coachStrong feedbackEasy to succeedComfortable classroomLight workload
  • Students consistently describe her as , and helpful.
  • The workload is manageable, especially for a writing course.
  • Getting a strong grade is realistic if students participate and revise their work.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

88/100

A strong grade looks very reachable because students report , and success through showing up.

, while in-person evidence more directly says attendance makes a good grade hard to miss.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

78/100

The writing course is described as not hard, but , and revision.

Online reviews emphasize learning without being overwhelmed, while and comfortable class rhythm.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

55/100

Attendance is not described as strictly enforced, but and participating.

In-person reviews mention participation and showing up, while online reviews .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

96/100

Students strongly recommend her because , and gives feedback that improves writing.

Both online and in-person reviews are strongly positive, with online students highlighting care and in-person students highlighting classroom comfort.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

86/100

because students report , and an easy path to a good grade.

Format shift

In-person reviews provide the clearest evidence of lenient outcomes, while and feedback.

Workload

Light

82/100

Students say she does not overload the class, though essays, readings, and pre-writes still require steady work.

Format shift

Online reviews directly say the workload is not overwhelming, while and revision.

Teaching experience

Excellent

96/100

Students consistently describe her as , and effective at improving writing.

Format shift

Online reviews emphasize care and writing improvement, while , and accessibility.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

, and revision rather than exams.

Format shift

Both formats point to writing assignments and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person students praise the comfortable class environment, peer feedback, and easy path to a and participation.

Main concern

Participation and showing up appear important.

What students said

“Pretty easy instructor. I enjoyed her class.”
ENGL100
“As long as you show up to class, it is hard to not get a good grade.”
ENGL103

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

Online students describe a but still improves writing.

Main concern

Reviews .

What students said

“Great teacher, doesn't drown you with and pre-writes.”
ENG100
“One of the only writing courses I have ever taken where I felt as though my writing GREATLY improved.”
ENGL100

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove an , and the course appears mainly writing- and assignment-based.

Exam policy not clearly provenWriting-focused assessment

Assessment risk

Varies

60/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, but they mention peer review and revision before submission.

Peer review before submissionExam policy not clearly proven
“During class, other students review your work and so that you can revise it before you turn it in.”
ENGL103

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove .

Exam policy not clearly proven

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“As long as you show up to class, it is hard to not get a good grade.”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and support. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

96/100

“Nina was one of the most thorough and .”

👍 Recommendation Rate

96/100

“Professor Calabretta is a very amazing English teacher and this class.”

📈 Grade Accessibility

88/100

“As long as you show up to class, it is hard to not get a good grade.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She is very funny and makes the classroom a comfortable environment where everyone feels like each other's friend.
  • Great teacher, doesn't drown you with and pre-writes.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Pretty easy instructor. I enjoyed her class.
  • This class is not hard but you will also learn a lot.
  • As long as you show up to class, it is hard to not get a good grade.

Theme 3

❤️ About Support

  • if needed and focuses on creating connections and making sure you understand :)
  • She went above and beyond to ensure every student felt respected, heard, and successful.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

74/100

Evidence confidence

Five consistent reviews across online and , but the sample is still small and .

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ENGL1003 reviews
ENG1001 review
ENGL1031 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

3

A 3

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values