AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Jose Cedeno

MATH141 · MATH40 · MATH142 · 150F · MATH152 · MATH20 · MATH151F · MATH120 · MATH15 · MATH100F · 150B · MATH151 · MATH015 · MATH142F · MATH100 · 47 lifetime ratings

AI rating
53/100
RMP rating
3.2/5
Take again
52.38%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Take him if you can attend consistently, do the homework, and ask questions, but if .

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaring but inconsistentLots of homeworkAttendance mattersExtra credit availableFast-paced lectures
  • Students often say he cares and offers , but teaching clarity varies widely.
  • , and attendance are recurring pressure points, especially in in-person classes.
  • Students strong in math can do well, while .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

An A is possible with , and , but many students say the workload and tests require steady effort.

Online evidence suggests a more forgiving path with , while and tougher grading.

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

The math content is often manageable, but , and test-heavy structure make it harder for weaker math students.

Online reviews describe clearer expectations, while and faster pacing.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

22/100

as necessary because missing class makes students fall behind or fail.

The ; online reviews do not clearly prove attendance policy.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

54/100

and support, but many avoid him because of unclear teaching and heavy homework.

Online reviews are strongly positive, while the .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

and dropped quizzes help, but several students still call him a .

Format shift

Online reviews mention extra credit positively, while complaints.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Many reviews mention lots of , and .

Format shift

Online reviews mention one to two homework assignments weekly, while or annoying.

Teaching experience

Average

56/100

He is often caring and helpful, but many students say .

Format shift

Online teaching is reviewed as clearer and more supportive, while .

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

Grades appear , and rather than one single method.

Format shift

In-person reviews give most of the assessment detail; , and study guides.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

45 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are mixed, with many students praising his care and while others criticize unclear, fast lectures and .

Main concern

behind quickly.

What students said

“If you miss days of class you will fall behind.”
MATH120
“He goes through the notes really fast and it is hard to keep up.”
MATH141

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews are very positive, describing clear expectations, flexible support, straightforward tests, and .

Main concern

There is too little online evidence to prove how consistent the experience is across courses.

What students said

“ . and similar to study guides”
MATH152
“The fabulous thing is EXTRA CREDITTTTTTT!”
MATH152

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam evidence is mixed, with online tests described as straightforward and as hard or test-heavy.

Straightforward Online TestsStudy Guide SimilarityTest Heavy In PersonCumulative Final

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and hard tests, but they do not clearly prove open-book, closed-book, or proctoring policy.

Test HeavyCumulative FinalWeekly Quizzes
“The , and there is no study guide for it.”
MATH100
“ ”
MATH142

Online

and similar to study guides, but they do not clearly prove proctoring, webcam, Lockdown Browser, or open-book policy.

Straightforward TestsSimilar To Study Guides
“ . and similar to study guides”
MATH152

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If and not understand.”

Voice snapshots generated from 47 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and attendance. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

56/100

“He cares and wants everyone to succeed.”

📚 Workload Pressure

28/100

“Lots of homework and quizzes.”

⚖️ Grade Path

58/100

“Do the homework and pay attention equals an easy a!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He goes through the notes really fast and it is hard to keep up.
  • Whenever I was having trouble understanding the formulas he made sure to repeat it differently in a way I would understand.
  • Does a bad job at explaining anything.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Expect to work hard for the grade you want.
  • He gives for and allows partners (on a few) quizzes.
  • Not difficult to get an A but you'll find that he does not prepare you well enough for calc.

Theme 3

🕒

  • behind and confused.
  • The . Lots of homework and quizzes.
  • and there is no required text meaning students must rely on his lecture notes.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

47

Recent reviews read by the AI

47

Lifetime ratings

91/100

Evidence confidence

The analysis uses 47 reviews across many years and courses, with consistent , and uneven clarity.

Inside 47 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 512
4 out of 59
3 out of 510
2 out of 512
1 out of 54

Course coverage

MATH10010 reviews
MATH1419 reviews
MATH1425 reviews
MATH1204 reviews
MATH142F3 reviews
Show 10 more courses
MATH403 reviews
MATH1512 reviews
MATH151F2 reviews
MATH1522 reviews
MATH202 reviews
150B1 review
150F1 review
MATH0151 review
MATH100F1 review
MATH151 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

24 reported outcomes

A range

11

A+ 3 · A 6 · A- 2

B range

6

B+ 1 · B 4 · B- 1

C range

4

C+ 1 · C 3

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 1