AI Rate Professor

Biology

Victor Pham

BIO19 · BIO190 · BIOL190 · 7 lifetime ratings

AI rating
92/100
RMP rating
4.7/5
Take again
57.14%
Difficulty
2.6

The decision

if you want a and can tolerate some organization issues.

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaringExtra creditEasy to passGroup projectsOccasionally disorganized
  • Most students describe Pham as caring, patient, and strong at explaining difficult biology content.
  • Grades are , and supportive instruction.
  • One in-person review raises concerns about disorganization, inconsistent information, and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

82/100

Students say the class is easy to pass and plus grade buffers make strong grades realistic, though not automatic.

, while the single online review is too brief to add much.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

Biology material is described as heavy or difficult, but .

, while online evidence is too limited.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

Reviews do not clearly prove strict attendance rules or .

Neither online .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

78/100

and clear, but recommendation strength is lowered by one detailed negative review and limited would-take-again data.

, while the online review is positive but vague.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

80/100

, grade buffers, and reported high averages suggest .

Format shift

In-person reviews provide the , while the online review only lists as a tag.

Workload

Moderate

60/100

Students , and group projects, but the class is still described as simple and stress-free.

Format shift

and manageable structure, while online evidence is too thin.

Teaching experience

Excellent

88/100

Most students , and one-on-one help, with one review citing disorganization.

Format shift

, while the online review is too brief to evaluate teaching depth.

Assessment method

Balanced

48/100

Assessment appears , and exams rather than relying on one method.

Format shift

, and exam averages, while online evidence is vague.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

6 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews describe a caring, helpful professor who makes difficult biology understandable and uses and group work.

Main concern

A minority , and inconsistent information.

What students said

“He doesn't mind sitting with you one on one for however long so you could understand the concepts.”
BIO190
“the ”
BIO19

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

The single online review is positive but too brief to support many format-specific conclusions.

Main concern

The evidence is too vague to judge online structure or policies.

What students said

“Cool.”
BIOL190

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The clearest exam-related evidence describes open-book online quizzes and in-class notes that help buffer grades.

Open-Book Online QuizzesIn-Class NotesExam Average Mentioned

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

82/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person evidence explicitly mentions open-book online quizzes, in-class notes, and an 88% exam average.

Open-Book Online QuizzesIn-Class NotesExam Average 88%
“ and in-class notes that helps buffer our grade.”
BIOL190
“The class Exam average was 88% and grade average was 93%.”
BIOL190

Online

The single online review does not clearly prove .

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Professor Pham is one of . He really cared about his students and our grades and he taught me the material in such an easy understandable way even though it was difficult.”

Voice snapshots generated from 7 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and consistency concerns. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

88/100

“He doesn't mind sitting with you one on one for however long so you could understand the concepts.”

📈 Grade Support

82/100

“His class is easy to pass and he gives .”

⚠️ Consistency Concern

55/100

“the , and sometimes he wasnt consistent with the information he gave us”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Victor Pham does a fantastic job of ensuring that his students comprehend the material
  • He really cared about his students and our grades and he taught me the material in such an easy understandable way even though it was difficult.
  • He does a very good job teaching the materials.

Theme 2

📈 About Grades & Work

  • His class is easy to pass and he gives .
  • Was lenient with .
  • and in-class notes that helps buffer our grade.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Concerns

  • However at times the
  • the
  • the course materials were still heavy.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

7

Recent reviews read by the AI

7

Lifetime ratings

72/100

Evidence confidence

Seven reviews give useful but uneven evidence, with one online review too short and some missing recommendation data.

Inside 7 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 56
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

BIOL1905 reviews
BIO191 review
BIO1901 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

7 reported outcomes

A range

3

A 3

B range

3

B+ 1 · B- 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Rather not say 1