AI Rate Professor

Chemistry

Victor Prutyanov

CHEM · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
56/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

if you are comfortable with some uncertainty and plan to use and office support.

Best fit · Effort For RewardPolarizing TeacherUnclear ExamsExtra CreditCaringSimplifies Concepts
  • Reviews are split between one very negative experience and one very positive experience.
  • One student says lessons, quizzes, and , while another says he makes chemistry less intimidating.
  • helps students who put in effort, but the limited review count lowers confidence.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

can reward effort, but one student withdrew and another earned a B+, so an A is not clearly easy.

All grade evidence comes from two in-person CHEM reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

Chemistry remains challenging, but one review says he simplified difficult concepts and made it less intimidating.

All course .

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

50/100

Participation is tagged once, but comments do not clearly prove a .

Only in-person reviews exist, and .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

55/100

Recommendation depends on learning style because one review praises his clarity and while another reports confusion and withdrawal.

All recommendation evidence .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

60/100

supports students who try, but there is grading.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

50/100

The workload is not clearly described as heavy or light, so the main issue is clarity rather than volume.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

and strong simplification of difficult concepts.

Format shift

In-person reviews directly conflict, so confidence is limited.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

75/100

One review specifically mentions quizzes and exams, while also affects grades.

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person feedback is sharply mixed, with one student praising his simplification and while another says lessons and .

Main concern

Exam and .

What students said

“his lessons are all over the place and the quizzes and ”
CHEM
“He simplified difficult concepts while also relating them to real-life applications.”
CHEM

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and , but do not clearly prove open-book rules, proctoring, or final format.

Unclear QuizzesUnclear ExamsExtra Credit

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and , but do not clearly prove proctoring, open-book rules, midterms, or finals.

Unclear QuizzesUnclear ExamsExtra Credit
“the quizzes and you're supposed to study for”
CHEM
“He gave rather than curving”
CHEM

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“He simplified difficult concepts while also relating them to real-life applications.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting conflicting themes in , and grading. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

55/100

“He simplified difficult concepts while also relating them to real-life applications.”

⚠️

45/100

“the quizzes and you're supposed to study for.”

⚖️

60/100

“He gave rather than curving so that students who tried benefited”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • his lessons are all over the place
  • He simplified difficult concepts while also relating them to real-life applications.

Theme 2

🧪 About Exams

  • the quizzes and you're supposed to study for
  • He gave rather than curving

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

35/100

Evidence confidence

, and they strongly conflict.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

CHEM2 reviews

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1