AI Rate Professor

Sociology

Selena Harrigan

SOC356 · SOC101 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
37/100
RMP rating
2.5/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

if , and unclear expectations, especially online.

Best fit · Effort For RewardTough graderReading heavyPop quizzesCaring but inconsistent
  • In-person SOC101 reviews are mixed, with one strong praise review and .
  • The only online review , and specific tests.
  • Students can pass, but earning an excellent grade appears difficult because .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

Passing is realistic, but getting an A , and tolerance for .

The , while the online review says grading and tests are harsher.

Is the course easy?

Standard

46/100

The content is manageable sociology material, but , and .

In person sounds more lecture-driven and manageable, while and less guided.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

55/100

Attendance is not clearly described as strictly mandatory, but participation and .

The attendance evidence comes from in-person participation and pop quiz comments, while the .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

36/100

Students are split, but the strongest , and pop quizzes.

In-person recommendations are mixed, while the only online review .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

25/100

Multiple reviews describe tough or and online work.

Format shift

, but the online review is the most severe.

Workload

Heavy

32/100

Reading, papers, discussions, and level suggests.

Format shift

Online work is described as readings and discussions, while in and .

Teaching experience

Poor

45/100

Some students liked her lectures and care, but and .

Format shift

In-person teaching has some praise, while the online review says guidance was poor.

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

Grades seem , and specific tests rather than exams alone.

Format shift

Online mentions readings, discussions, and tests, while in , and pop quizzes.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews show engaging lectures and stories, but and .

Main concern

Excellent scores are hard because papers, participation, and .

What students said

“I really enjoyed the professor's lectures.”
SOC101
“she is pretty critical on what is defined as an excellent paper.”
SOC101
“ so you need to read the textbook.”
SOC101

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The online review , and highly specific tests.

Main concern

Online expectations and and harsh.

What students said

“She is such a and barely gives ANY information on what she wants done but grades you like there was a .”
SOC356
“ and so specific, word by word answers.”
SOC356

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention specific online tests and , but do not clearly prove proctoring or .

Specific TestsPop QuizzesPaper-Based Assessment

Assessment risk

Standard

42/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, but reviews do not clearly prove midterm, final, closed-book, or proctoring rules.

Pop Quizzes
“ so you need to read the textbook.”
SOC101

Online

The online review mentions very specific tests, but reviews do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, or open-book rules.

Specific Tests
“ so specific, word by word answers.”
SOC356

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you don't get at least a B on this class, is because you really didn't try.”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

45/100

“I really enjoyed the professor's lectures.”

⚖️

25/100

“She's very cut throat in her grading and seems hard to get an .”

📚 Workload Risk

32/100

“ and so specific, word by word answers.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • I really enjoyed the professor's lectures.
  • she's cool, she has some good stories to share and gives everyone a chance to speak or share their stories.

Theme 2

⚖️

  • She is such a and barely gives ANY information on what she wants done but grades you like there was a .
  • She's very cut throat in her grading and seems hard to get an .

Theme 3

📝 About Quizzes and Reading

  • so you need to read the textbook.
  • and so specific, word by word answers.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Four reviews across several years give useful but limited evidence, with and mixed teaching reactions.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

SOC1013 reviews
SOC3561 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

3

B 2 · B- 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values