AI Rate Professor

English

Lynne Pantano

ENGLI100 · ENGLI103 · ENG101 · ENGLISH · ENGLISH59 · ENG100 · ENG103 · 18 lifetime ratings

AI rating
72/100
RMP rating
4.2/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
3.1

The decision

if you want patient writing support and , and participation.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyHelpful writing coachTough but fair graderLots of papersCaring supportSometimes disorganized
  • Most students describe Pantano as helpful, patient, and effective at improving writing skills.
  • The course is writing-heavy, and several students warn that .
  • Older negative reviews mention lateness, disorganization, and , but positive teaching comments are more common.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

45/100

An A is possible, but students , and small assignments that can hurt grades.

because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

50/100

The writing concepts are teachable and beginner-friendly for many students, but the and .

All course difficulty evidence is from in-person English writing courses.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

58/100

Attendance is encouraged through participation and labs, but one review explicitly .

Only in-person reviews discuss attendance, and the evidence suggests participation .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

66/100

, but tough grading and organization complaints create hesitation.

The recommendation score .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

48/100

Students call her tough but fair, with and , but not an easy A.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

34/100

The workload is heavy because students mention , and many assignments.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Good

74/100

Most comments praise her patience, helpfulness, and writing instruction despite some reports of lateness and disorganization.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

15/100

Assessment is dominated by papers, reports, labs, peer editing, and smaller assignments rather than exams.

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

18 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person students mostly praise her helpfulness and writing instruction, though workload and .

Main concern

The , and some reports of disorganization or .

What students said

“Good professor. Lots of interesting material covered. .”
ENG101
“Not an easy A.”
ENG101
“She is difficult to understand and is irresponsive to e-mails.”
ENG103

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove traditional exams, so assessment risk appears centered on .

PapersResearch PaperSmall AssignmentsLabs

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

72/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, peer editing, and small assignments, but do not clearly prove quiz, midterm, final, open-book, or proctoring policies.

PapersResearch PaperSmall AssignmentsLabs
“5 papers, plus a research paper.”
ENG101
“What killed me was the .”
ENG101
“You and there is lots of peer editing.”
ENG101

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I did not but now I do.”

Voice snapshots generated from 18 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and organization. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

74/100

“I did not but now I do.”

⚖️

48/100

“This profesor is a but fair.”

📚 Workload

34/100

“5 papers, plus a research paper.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She is so nice and helpful!
  • Great! Very helpful and easy to understand.
  • She tells .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • Not an easy A.
  • ...overall okay teacher
  • .

Theme 3

🧾 About Workload and Structure

  • 5 papers, plus a research paper.
  • You and there is lots of peer editing.
  • She is late for every class and does not make an .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

18

Recent reviews read by the AI

18

Lifetime ratings

72/100

Evidence confidence

There are 18 reviews, but many are old and several are brief, so the broad themes are credible while current conditions are less certain.

Inside 18 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 512
4 out of 52
3 out of 52
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ENG1035 reviews
ENG1013 reviews
1002 reviews
ENG1002 reviews
ENGLISH2 reviews
Show 4 more courses
591 review
ENGLI1001 review
ENGLI1031 review
ENGLISH591 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

6 reported outcomes

A range

3

A 2 · A- 1

B range

2

B 2

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values